Re: LEGENDARY UNICORN CHOMPER - Why make a dank game? Ruining of game aesthetics
@xcrimsonlegendx wrote:
@Littlebewolf wrote:
@xcrimsonlegendx wrote:
@Littlebewolf wrote:
@xcrimsonlegendx wrote:Its not a nyan cat ripoff, its based off of Bjorn from Peggle, another great Popcap game.
Even if it wasn't, I think the goofiness suits GW just fine. We have tons of weird characters and even more bizarre accessories. The game is supposed to be zany and weird, that kind of stuff IS the game aesthetic.
Well it's lame and it don't fit the aesthetic. Watch the vid and pay attention please. Where I said it was nyan cat rip of? How you even making that assumption, well you dont even understand aesthetics so that explains that.
I'm not even sure what you're asking. In your OP you clearly stated "remove the meme nyan cat unicorn from the game" Implying that you think its based on the Nyan cat meme which it isn't. I've seen the video you're talking about and the aesthetics of the first game were just as goofy, the peashooter had "egg eyes" as an accessory too, so honestly the "aesthetic" of Garden Warfare has always been about toilet paper and goofy animals stuck on your head. I don't see the Unicorn chomper as anything but more of the same, it fits perfectly because Garden Warfare is itself a silly game.
I am saying it's similar, sorry if you cant understand that. I explained the aesthetics:"The tinfoil, tincan, and pan as armor stays with the aesthetics like the game always have been. Example: Zombies with traffic cone and metal bucket as armor. And disco zombie with afro wig and sunglasses." It would help if you read the whole post." the PvZ did it perfect first time(overwhelming positive on steam) EA don't need to ruin that like they pretty much did with all stuff they touched.
And also you saying it's not breaking aesthetics when you say they take a character from another game and trying to impliment in this one. This states you don't understand aesthetics
I did read the entire post, please refrain from using the aggressive tone friend.
If you had read my entire post I was saying that goofiness IS part of Garden Warfare. According to you a cone hat is okay but eggs aren't? What about the Engineer hat that is a cone WITH an egg on it? Where do you draw the line? The first game had more goofy accessories than they had serious ones, I don't really understand where you're coming from. You act as if none of the silly accessories existed, they're not "breaking the aesthetics" of the game in GW2 because they are literally of the same tone as the first one. If you're trying to compare Garden Warfare to the original Plants Vs Zombies tower defense game... That is old news, Garden Warfare is its own series and this series is silly. The tag line for the game was initially "Shooters just got weird".
I respect your opinion, I would just just like to say I think you're misunderstanding how aesthetics works since GW1 had FOUR characters taken from promotional food products and two of them had cartoon Cheetahs pasted all over them.
And also you saying it's not breaking aesthetics when you say they take a character from another game and trying to impliment in this one.
I don't find much wrong in the cheetah skin. But egg as eyes abit too dank/lame better use googley eyes or pencil drawning so it keep the sillyness instead of trying to ruin the game with the other stuff. Once you understand aesthetics you will get it.
Just put eggs on your eyes to so if it bodes well instead of silly eye glasses.
