10 years ago
Rose isn't that bad
Why do people think that rose is weak? I admit she seemed useless after the patch on her but now zombies constantly underestimate roses and as a result of this I usually get top kills and assists 85% ...
You can't fully dismiss a class based soley on its ability to kill. That's pretty dumb. Sure you get many more kills as say a peashooter, but on defensive maps where would you be without the humble sunflower keeping your defence alive? Where would you be without Rose on offensive maps building teleporters, and disabling the defenders (if the game was balanced on those maps lol)?
BTW does anyone know for certain if goatify affects the ability of zombies to count as a defender when capping a point? It shouldn't imo, but if they still do then maybe that could be a (very) useful buff for her.
Would you or anyone play Engineer if all he had was stun and a jackhammer and a weapon on par with Rose? I doubt it man.
Actually I would if we needed the Teleporter up, and no-one else had taken that role. I take Rose when needed for the same reason.
Are you saying you'd rather lose than take a class that can't rack up kills? Go figure 😉
@MrBays
I have a question for you. Where would you put Rose on a tier list of all character classes... I just want your opinion. I dislike PopCaps argument for support. I think it's a bogus excuse, and that whole "support" reasoning is why this game is terribly unbalanced right now. Apparently the only real support characters in this game are the Sunflower and the Rose. Because the Zombies don't actually have one, they're all attack. So I'm just curious. Where she is on your tier list of effective characters.
The Plants are the only side that feels the effects of this BS support thing they keep talking about. The devs have never, ever, said that the scientist is support. That's why his dps is absurdly high. Rose is the only character in the game with absolutely no attack abilities. And a weak primary. How does that bring "balance" to the game.