Forum Discussion

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
10 years ago
Approved

Re: Global Trading is broken.

In retrospect you're right - corporal punishment is wrong, there should be something worse than corporal punishment dealt out to game developers and support who constantly give BS answers and don't fix a serious problem with their game.

I have now been reading the forums, FAQ's and the like - you people are atrocious! You go on making poor excuses, pat answers and the complaints keep rolling in.

You DON't want to change what is very obviously a broken area of the game and you want to keep making P**s poor excuses because it's easier and you get more money the old way.

Suggestions have been made:

- Categorise the items into Building supplies, Raw materials, expansion items etc.

- Increase the number of items on display - we don't need to see our city when trading

- Barter for items

- make expansion items more easily available: in thought bubbles, gifts etc or pop up more often

- remove the price limiting

-Allow a search engine to find the items WE WANT.

All or some of the above can be used - don't make invalid, childish and ill considered excuses, consider the suggestions and implement something.

PS I have little hope that anything will be done, I will eventually uninstall your game and we will both go our merry ways; me to a better game, you to eventual collapse of this game in probably 6 months to a year when people no longer want to play this game and the community shrinks.

Have fun and remember every dog has his day and justice will prevail, if not now, eventually....

6 Replies

  • Yes it is wrong to threaten someone and "righting" a "wrong" by inspiring a "wrong" is not the answer.

    I too, have read and replied to many posts concerning the GTHQ's. Its not impossible to purchase needed items; you need to be persistent and to dig deep. Does the GTHQ have a problem, yes definitely. Millions of players, listing 1-12 items each and yet only 24 cities are represented at one time. Giving us a chance at 300 items or less (viewable at one time) vs millions of potential.

    Some of the earlier comments on the GTHQ are:

    Allowing us to log into the market in order to see all that is there, not just to display 24 out of those millions of cities

    Logging in could lead to purchasing, bartering and plain old gratuity's to a friend or potential friend

    Logging in could lead to interaction of players, take out the FB aspect and go right to the "friend" to do business with

    Having a "general store" for purchasing items on EA's servers could work as well.

    Setting all this up on EA's servers should be a snap

    All we can do is to keep letting EA know our "wants" to make this game better. I don't think forcing anyone is the correct way.

    nw8240bp

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Approved

    Hi nw8240bp

    Really! Moralising is going to solve the problem? Think!

    I have been sitting the last 4 days trying to buy 1 'dozer wheel and 3 exhausts. That's the problem. I am simply trying to show the extent of my frustration. Sometimes people WON'T move until forced just look around you and at history, the examples abound, from large world shaking ones to little problems like ours.

    At any rate, as I am overseas I couldn't carry out the threat even if I wanted to, which I don't. But as long as simpleton moralists like you keep moralising we certainly won't get a positive result.

    And EA keeps ignoring the problem and laughing all the way to the bank!

    Just saying.

  • sfury1

    You never even read my post. If you would have then you would already know how I feel about this topic. I have written many posts about the GTHQ's and the fact that it is not working to the players advantage. Did you read any of those other posts? Obviously not.

    So yes the moral thing to say hear is: knocking, slandering or putting down someone to get them to do something for you is insane. That has never worked in my entire life. But as stated in my other posts positive suggestions will work.

    nw8240bp

    PS I see that the community manager did not like the comments either

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Approved

    To nw8240bp

    Shame.

  • Anonymous's avatar
    Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Approved

    Do you think you are taking this free mobile game a little too serious?

  • rougue32,

    That may be a possibility. I still work full time Monday thru Friday, 50-53 hours per week. I spend only a 1/2 hour per day playing the game. So the time I spend on this game is not a lot of time but I would still think that EA would level the playing field not matter if you are serious or not see below.

    rougue32 I am not disagreeing with you: its not true in my case but how can we explain to the players that have spent a lot of their own money on this game that "you are taking this too serious"? How can we say that to them after the money they spent and then the playing rules are not fair?

    I have responded to several players that have spent hundreds of dollars and have apologized on EA's part to them for the games shortcomings. Why would I apologize? Just because I am passionate towards other human beings. I don't want to see them spend precious dollars on a game that should not be taken seriously. Who is at fault then? Maybe EA should change this freemium game to a one time purchase price and then we play on and on without regard to the rules. Lets face it: this game is a twist on the freemium game model and EA's position is to make money wherever it can. They are a "for profit corporation" and they are doing all they can to make money. I just wish the playing rules were fair, because after all EA is making money at our expense.

    nw8240bp