Forum Discussion

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
11 years ago
Approved

Sneaky algorithm

It seems to me that certain items only appear in GO HQ when either I don't need them, or I haven't got enough room in my storage to buy them. I have thought this for a while but thought I was probabl...
Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
11 years ago
Approved

Except that checking my tablet city at the same time, which needs one shovel, plenty of textiles appear, but not one shovel. Of course this proves nothing, but I do think that it seems too coincidental.  I would be curious to hear from others if they try the same test.

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
11 years ago
Approved
Hey, people believe what they want to believe. 🙂 If all evidence to the contrary is ignored and only supporting evidence is considered valid, then of course it seems like EA is out to punch you in the face and eat your lunch.

But hey, they're not paying me to defend them against those that don't believe in randomness and coincidence, and three pages (and several other threads) later, I'm tiring of the repetition.

Try proving that you're not a witch to a group of people that think you're a witch. 🙂

  • 2crudedudes's avatar
    2crudedudes
    11 years ago
    @jeffk42 wrote:
    If all evidence to the contrary is ignored and only supporting evidence is considered valid, then of course it seems like EA is out to punch you in the face and eat your lunch.


    Let's see... Lots of people complaining about an issue vs one guy saying he has no problems.... What 'all evidence to the contrary'? You're the only one claiming that, and you sound like a shill doing so. You don't have a problem? Then what are you doing here? Trolling the forums to brag?

    • Anonymous's avatar
      Anonymous
      11 years ago
      Approved
      Sorry, make that three posts. You just keep talking. 🙂
    • Anonymous's avatar
      Anonymous
      11 years ago
      Approved
      @2crudedudes wrote:
      @jeffk42 wrote:
      If all evidence to the contrary is ignored and only supporting evidence is considered valid, then of course it seems like EA is out to punch you in the face and eat your lunch.


      Let's see... Lots of people complaining about an issue vs one guy saying he has no problems.... What 'all evidence to the contrary'? You're the only one claiming that, and you sound like a shill doing so. You don't have a problem? Then what are you doing here? Trolling the forums to brag?

      You're not a very careful reader, are you. JeffK is not the only one claiming to have no problem with the HQ. I stated earlier that I have achieved full territory expansion in my 2 cities (levels 14 and 26), and am about to achieve full storage expansion in both as well. I used my level 14 city as a feeder city for dozer parts, but that was just to save some time. And my level 26 city is doing quite nicely with storage items on its own.

      EA shills -- we are legion.

      • 2crudedudes's avatar
        2crudedudes
        11 years ago
        @TheOtherIvan wrote:
        @2crudedudes wrote:
        @jeffk42 wrote:
        If all evidence to the contrary is ignored and only supporting evidence is considered valid, then of course it seems like EA is out to punch you in the face and eat your lunch.


        Let's see... Lots of people complaining about an issue vs one guy saying he has no problems.... What 'all evidence to the contrary'? You're the only one claiming that, and you sound like a shill doing so. You don't have a problem? Then what are you doing here? Trolling the forums to brag?

        You're not a very careful reader, are you. JeffK is not the only one claiming to have no problem with the HQ. I stated earlier that I have achieved full territory expansion in my 2 cities (levels 14 and 26), and am about to achieve full storage expansion in both as well. I used my level 14 city as a feeder city for dozer parts, but that was just to save some time. And my level 26 city is doing quite nicely with storage items on its own.

        EA shills -- we are legion.

        So.. 2 people, crucify me. You cannot argue that EA doesn't want you to expand very quickly. The very essence of "time management" games would contradict you. We're just going an extra step and implying that EA is purposely hiding these items. But it's not a jump in logic, because by definition, time management games are supposed to waste your time by making you wait. So it's not only a reasonable assumption, we're seeing evidence of it in the forums. 2 people say 'no that's not true' and I'm supposed to change my mind? I'm not that gullible.

Recent Discussions