Had/has Battlefront 2 problems with cheaters?
I mean, I'm a new player and in a few games I notice that low level players end the games with a lot of kills. All EA online games have or had problems with cheaters, specially BFV, is Battlefront 2 ...
Forum Discussion
@AhuronIVDefine low level. If one has level 25 in one class, he can already unlock and upgrade his desired star card loadout to maximum.
Also this game is rather casual and I can say that in like 75% of all supremacy matches I've played since yesterday, I was the only veteran in that match.
So the better of the new players play against a lot of new players as well and therefore have an easier time.
Also I suspect that there is a number of veterans who in fact repurchased the game from epic store (a friend of mine got it another 3 times for himself and friends), because the flood of new players doesn't really explain for me the now almost complete absence of veterans in supremacy matches.
I didn't look into GA, but I noticed that quite some of the "new" players in supremacy appeared like they really knew what do to, just disadvantaged because of worse star cards.
I mean not only because of their aim, but also because of their movement, gadget usage etc.
This is just my theory though.
Overall I can say from my experience that this game doesn't have a great problem with cheaters, those few who cheat are often very blatant with it.
Server lag and server instability is a real problem though.
@TRlALON At least it's not the BFV level, heck even on console I've been shot through some suspicious and weird stuff in that game and attrition ugh a system that was supposed to promote team play on paper but in reality promoted sitting in a tank/bush with no manual spotting and abusing the infamous 250 round MG42, and how about planes being laughably underpowered compared to bf1 while tanks killed me multiple times while sitting away like 300 miles from the nearest flag in BfV what a mess this game was what a mess and it is sad because I do enjoy some of it's other aspects but the things that make it bad(discussed above) are much more annoying so that drains out most of my will to play BFv
@soapy_catuses#Offtopic: I wonder why it's not an open secret to more people that every of these features that are meant to add "realism" to any game just encourage boring camper play.
Hardcore mode in BF3? So many people just camping or afraid to advance because the stronger weapons would OHK, not only sniper rifles.
Also hardcore mode disables your mag counter, while the game doesn't offer you any alternative way to look for your ammo like ejecting the mag briefly or looking into your ammo pouches.
Doesn't feel like hardcore, just straight annoying.
I know that real life war is and was pretty much waiting at some spot all the time and getting hit for only once really isn't good at all, but it's still a game and supposed to be fun.
There is this WWI game called Verdun, yeah not fun at all to just wait in the trench all the time to occasionally OHK people and get OHK in return.
- @TRlALON Played verdun for like 3 days and got bored lol
- @soapy_catuses So basically you got the full BFV experience on one map since only like 4 maps in the entire game have a decent vehicle presence lol.
- @TRlALON You mean "HardCamp"? lol In BF4, it was always a bunch of snipers who wanted a one hit kill lol. My experience is it's always been for KDR obsessed players who want to clip someone's ankle and get a kill for it. It was that way back in COD4 when HardCamp basically first got popular. COD and Battlefield have such low TTK I never understood the point of lowering the TTK even further in HardCamp. Sure take away the HUD, etc. but that's it.
