Terrible weapon design
Why is dice terrible at making weapons. The heavy weapons in particular are terrible like the inaccuracy and low damage is really bad. The heavy weapons should be the ones providing suppressive fire ...
Forum Discussion
Yes, T-21 was really strong. It was nerfed but still good.
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/New-Weapons-Age-of-Rebellion-Update/m-p/8781208#M10717
( Old Data :P )
By the way, I wanted to see the Cycler Rifle's bullet penetrate shields... 🤔
My problem is the damage, the spreading of my shots and the amount I shoot. They couldn't have just put recoil on the weapon. I hope the person who designed these weapons never makes weapons again.
@Christo04002283The DC-15LE with explosive shots (and recoil reduction gadget) has a good accuracy, despite being full auto.
The FWMB-10K is decent too, but I prefer the DC-15LE because the explosive dmg makes this weapon slightly more powerful and easier to handle targets (splash damage, damage modifier from splash damage hitting head).
Additionally, if you hold down right mouse button/console equivalent to zoom in, the recoil is further reduced which effectively improves the accuracy of any weapon as well.
Crouching does it too and if you do both at the same time, the recoil reduction stacks.
It's a fact only few know about. For some weapons it doesn't make much sense using these tricks, but for the heavy class weapons it definitely does.
Even the default heavy weapons can become deadly against regular soldiers on mid-distance by doing this.
I just hate how they made the heavy weapons a close to medium range weapon, they should be medium range to long range weapons. They make you shoot at the hip instead of aiming down the weapon like in the movies or shows. And the base heavy weapon is straight out trash, whoever made it shouldn't make any more weapons, the gun doesn't deal damage, it doesn't have the accuracy, or the firepower, so why did they make it this way. These people are so dumb.
