Empty Server List (Already Tried Previous Suggestions)

@Coirbidh 

have you rebooted the modem (just in case ?) it usually has its own firewall and can glitch occasionally 

Didn't seem to have any positive effect—still get the blank server list.

@Coirbidh 

There is a way to ping to make sure you can talk to the server list , i just cant remember what the dns name was at moment , will ask when support are online again in about 5 hrs

Okay, thanks.

@Coirbidh 

just remembered try pinging gamepad.swtor.com that is the server list location 

@proxos666

Thanks for your help last night!

Since then I've deleted my old installation, re-installed it (using this PlayOnMac guide; wine version 3.10-staging, with d3dx9_36 and crypt32, Windows version set to Windows 10), and downloaded the game again.

That didn't fix my problem.

Nor did connecting to a different network (local xfinity hotspot; network worked fine for regular internet browsing and stuff).

It's possible there's a firewall on that hotspot, but there's not much I can do about that, I guess.

Also, here is a sample ping I just performed:

Ping has started…

PING gamepad.lb.swtor.biowareonline.net (159.153.92.47): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=0 ttl=227 time=84.809 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=227 time=93.187 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=227 time=87.013 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=3 ttl=227 time=85.982 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=227 time=83.550 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=227 time=84.147 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=227 time=85.164 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=227 time=84.441 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=8 ttl=227 time=84.560 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=9 ttl=227 time=83.461 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=10 ttl=227 time=86.263 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=11 ttl=227 time=85.082 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=12 ttl=227 time=84.843 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=13 ttl=227 time=85.906 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=14 ttl=227 time=83.754 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=15 ttl=227 time=85.092 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=16 ttl=227 time=84.052 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=17 ttl=227 time=83.409 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=18 ttl=227 time=173.659 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=19 ttl=227 time=83.670 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=20 ttl=227 time=84.492 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=21 ttl=227 time=84.535 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=22 ttl=227 time=83.802 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=23 ttl=227 time=94.261 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=24 ttl=227 time=85.950 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=25 ttl=227 time=87.165 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=26 ttl=227 time=86.591 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=27 ttl=227 time=93.853 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=28 ttl=227 time=85.233 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=29 ttl=227 time=86.269 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=30 ttl=227 time=85.231 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=31 ttl=227 time=82.799 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=32 ttl=227 time=86.410 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=33 ttl=227 time=83.348 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=34 ttl=227 time=106.693 ms

64 bytes from 159.153.92.47: icmp_seq=35 ttl=227 time=83.712 ms

Any thoughts?

@Coirbidh 

if the ping responds it should reach the list 

have you thought about a different version of wine staging ? https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=13553 is the only thing not changed at this point

https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=34946 seems to indicate 6.0-rc3-staging

notes just have 

With wine 6.0 staging everything works fine, but you may need to run:

winetricks d3dcompiler_47 d3dx9_41

The only other thing is your previous post you mention "Windows version set to Windows 10)"  i would suggest windows 7 as a trial instead of 10

@proxos666

I haven't tried 6.0-staging or 6.0-rc3, but I did try using 4.19-staging and that didn't help.

I'll try 6.0 next.