This is really bothering me...
I’m farming the characters that are needed for Jedi Luke, but is really discouraging to know that he works better with other Jedi and only... Except with Revan, the only Jedi that are really good to c...
Forum Discussion
"kello_511;c-2176329" wrote:
I don’t think his point is that far fetched. Everyone likes to throw the “it’s a holofable simulation” thing out there, but most things in the game are fairly consistent with lore. Especially around faction tags.
They almost always make sense from a lore perspective as well, other than a few edge cases where it’s debatable (Asajj as a sith for example).
It’s relatively rare where a toon doesn’t have tags that would undoubtedly apply from a lore POV.
I get that it is what it is and that game balance is the reason. But I also don’t think that he is that far out in left field to question it.
They are?
You do realize that many of the game modes have us pitting toons against situations they were not even in, or teams of toons that are both LS and DS, or even the same person standing next to themselves......
There are less lore based things in this game than there are lore based, when you really look at it.
You are right, and most here are not giving him any flack for asking, but just as it's not out of left field to ask, it's also not out of left field to accept that it's a game about a game and that in game balance is important and in some cases more important than adding lore.
Note: I said adding lore, because he still follows lore with the tags he has, they just didnt add more that would also fit within lore. They have never broken the following of lore when making any kit, they have limited the view, sure, but they have never in any way put a tag on that didnt make sense from a lore perspective.
