Should we get empty worlds to build up ourselves?

While we're at it, give create a world tool.

they should just add template from every world we have in game but completely empty with 0 decoration

and we could add as many worlds as we please with "create a new world" thingy

sort of like how we had it with ts2

could also throw in some maps from ts 1&2

i absolutely detest newcrest though because of the overload of ugly fx houses i cant hide so no not like that

i voted no, just because look at newcrest, practically no one plays in it and when you do fill it up it feels weird to play in! I know this is a unpopular opinion but....

I like empty worlds and would hope for larger empty worlds.

"izecson;c-17605946" wrote:
While we're at it, give create a world tool.

I have a feeling that EA is worried about saved game files getting too big, and that's why they haven't given us one and probably never will. Its the same reason they gave as to why we couldn't freely travel between worlds in the Sims 3. It maybe the ability to freely travel between worlds or the ability to create our own. Yes I heard that someone is developing a Create a World mod for the Sims 4, but even so, that's a mod, not anything official and there were mods that let you travel between worlds in the Sims 3 as well.

"nerdfashion;c-17607134" wrote:
Nope. I've got way too much space as it is, and I don't want my map screen to be filled up with sudden empty worlds that I feel like I have to fill up eventually even though I have zero building talent whatsoever.

I don't and many if not most of the neighborhoods in the current worlds are designed specifically for residential or commercial venues, and usually when you try to mix the two, something about it looks bad.

A Create-A-World (or Create-A-Town/Neighborhood?) Tool would be perfect for The Sims 4, if it's like the one in The Sims 3.

1.) We take more control of our game.
2.) Brings back the god-mode aspect
3.) Gives us the potential to feel more immersed during gameplay.
4.) Couldn't they introduce a gallery category for "Worlds"? That would benefit both the players + EA.
5.) More reasons and benefits... it would help the budding civil engineers... etc. ...

I'd prefer a CAW tool I prefer the worlds be my own and the style I see fit. With how it is now I'd actually prefer empty worlds seeing as I have to delete the premade lots as is. Also Newcrest is one of my favorite worlds because it does not have a set forced style and you can make the "world" look how you want without it looking completely out of place.

I would love that but only if it comes with a variety of climates and biosphere. I don't use Newcrest often cause it feels just like Willow Creek.

As much as I would love a CAW tool, if I could get some more empty worlds that would be great. That being said, I do not want a shell of every world we have. I want unique worlds with their own reasons to play. Love the base formula of Newcrest, and for a long time my main save was there with a completely filled out world, but it does not have the extra oomph of neighborhood space like later worlds.

Take Sulani for example. It has the scenery, swimming, waterfalls, the festivals, etc. If we could have an open world as interactive as that, it would be great and I would be willing to pay for it.

What I do not want is for an open world to take the place of a regular new world from an EP or a GP. To be honest, a good SP not aimed at gameplay containing a world and limited "stuff" would be perfect to me (the world being the onus and focus if it is not obvious). I think that is perfect because a GP is supposed to be a world and gameplay. Recently SPs, half of a GP, have been looking at gameplay to be worth their $10, however they could also do the other half, worlds.

I would not want every SP to be this, but it would shake up the formula in a way I would appreciate. Plus give me a more interesting world to truly take over.