Sims 4's development is ending?
So, I heard from people that the Sims series kind of has a "schedule" to the release of sequels. Once every four years or something like that. We are already in the fourth year, which means that the S...
Forum Discussion
"mirta000;c-16349436" wrote:
you can do simulation on frostbite just fine.
But it wouldn't be able to run things like in game building tools just fine. Not to mention Frostbite is extremely unfriendly when it comes to modding.
One of the questions actually is why TS4 wasn't developed on frostbite from beggining and instead picked such a limiting engine that you can't even have non flat terrain.
It's not really a question given that Frostbite wasn't mandated by EA until after The Sims 4 began development.
"mirta000;c-16349436" wrote:
Horribly untrue.
No, it's not. Just in the past few months alone we've seen various developers come out saying that $60 simply isn't enough to turn a profit on these games with insane budgets which is what has lead to the rise in more microtransactions, season passes, etc, to try and cover the inflated costs of games.
Hence why we're seeing more advanced games get developed for cheaper.
Not from companies like EA, WB, Ubisoft, Rockstar, etc, your not.
We're certainly seeing indie games and games from smaller studios being done for cheaper, but games like Battlefront 2, Red Dead Redemption 2, Assassin's Creed Origins, Shadow of War, Injustice 2, etc, were not cheaper to develop than their predecessors.
TS4 was a) supposed to be online b) built on a really bad engine and c) rushed.
And it would be impossible for The Sims 5 to do have any of those faults or make all new mistakes right?
Featured Places
