Developer and Player relationships
Why moderator close Topic? I think many want talk around this question.
Forum Discussion
"ScareyBillie26;c-2054234" wrote:
theres only one way WCS can be taken seriously .. ABSOLUTELY NO FUNDS SPENT on server .. see who wins on even keel for ALL
This one I very much agree to. With pay to win, someone has an advantage. If there wasn't it would be based on skill. A player who know how to 1 shot outposts can easily keep up with a player who pays yet is a novice. Combine those 2 traits together, and you have your best players. I would like to see a server like this, the only pay option would be to cut the research costs of units for 1 week by 10 to 20%.
"ScareyBillie26;c-2054235" wrote:
server mite take a while but it will show the players real skills
Definity a very long and brutal struggle. I agree with your most recent comments. Just take me to a newly released server and I'd be by your side. My game exclusive alt needs a "fortress defeated" medal before it can participate in a WCS.
It seems the way your comment suggests that your a pro player who rarely spends TA funds.
