Reduce malus on world Tiberian 42
Hi, Seems that the configuration of this server is the same than on last Tib40 at the beginning. (+4 lvl difference malus instead of +6 ?) https://forums.ea.com/en/commandandconquer/discussion/2...
Forum Discussion
multi> @JCXer said:
> This is so sad and laughable. Cherry Hunters (Duracell and sentierosso’s alliance) is on Tib 42 with 4 teams with only 25 real players in each alliance. The rest are alts. They’ve been using extreme multi-accounting to try to get a lead over all the other alliances that aren’t using these cheap exploits. Their top guys are only big because they’re using 10-15 alts to feed their main.
>
> High malus helps reduce the effectiveness of alt accounts. If anything, the malus on Tib 42 needs to be HIGHER, not lower.
I agree as well, do not change the malus lvl, allowing multi alts to go further will just defy the purpose of your patches, come on leave it as it is.
> This is so sad and laughable. Cherry Hunters (Duracell and sentierosso’s alliance) is on Tib 42 with 4 teams with only 25 real players in each alliance. The rest are alts. They’ve been using extreme multi-accounting to try to get a lead over all the other alliances that aren’t using these cheap exploits. Their top guys are only big because they’re using 10-15 alts to feed their main.
>
> High malus helps reduce the effectiveness of alt accounts. If anything, the malus on Tib 42 needs to be HIGHER, not lower.
I agree as well, do not change the malus lvl, allowing multi alts to go further will just defy the purpose of your patches, come on leave it as it is.
