Forum Discussion
3 years ago
@Pad, all good mate. Minor offenses. Apologies all the same. I just get worked up when people start name calling. Anyway, I agree with you to some extent that this game is broken. But let's not attribute all of it to alt abuse. There are other areas that are well known imbalances and likely can be improve upon. Will they? Well that all depends on the resources I guess.
I'll be honest and say I hated the devs after learning about the private meeting and bashed them for it publicly but that's water under the bridge and things moved on just like how it will be after this current WCS. I'm in IT appdev so i can understand the frustration the Devs have and also as a customer of this game I can understand the frustration clients/customers have. Can theydo better job? Sure. Always room for improvement and that's what we're all hoping to see for our beloved game.
Now as for "Project" team setting precedence and killing the game's fun and competition. No, they did not solely do it. It was slowly getting there. To their defense, their formula is nothing new. Mara did it for quite some time; hence, where they recruited top players from good teams (KoN/Trick, DragonClaws, etc). Schaffa did it also, and so did the top teams like AB, IW and so on. Sh1t, i remember going up against some of these teams and was always losing and was demoralizing. Then again i'm a supernoob so it's my destiny to lose :wink:
Now as for players not wanting to play because of this, that's really on them. I continued to play even though I know the opposing teams are stacked. It's all part of learning. We take our chances, just like WCS 2019. We knew we didn't have a complete team and the "Coalition" (the teams who were against Schaffa) wasn't organize--too many chiefs not enough indians. But we still played. We loss sure but we kept going and playing thereafter. Lessons learned. Just like how it will be when "Project" is gone. Just like how it was when Mara stopped, new team emerge and the cycle repeats.
My last thoughts on "Project" that i'd like to get cleared up, I would say 80% of Project members do not abuse alts for prehitting as many thinks. I would even go far saying 90% since the 10% uses alts only to help in the beginning. Some of these players are really just good players. Some are decent and some are cherry pickers. lol. Well, we all have those. Project was born after WCS 2019 and was a culmination of years of hard work by good leadership (which the Coalition lacked). I did not start for first year and a half with them because I left the game but can honestly say these last 2 servers, I have seen vast improvement from what we wanted the Coalition to be. So Kudos to Bruell & team to be able to bring all the top international players together.
Lastly, do I vote for banning alt use altogether for the sake of keeping this game alive and fun? Absolutely, YES.
**well i have fun with or without them--it's a game after all**. Cheers!
I'll be honest and say I hated the devs after learning about the private meeting and bashed them for it publicly but that's water under the bridge and things moved on just like how it will be after this current WCS. I'm in IT appdev so i can understand the frustration the Devs have and also as a customer of this game I can understand the frustration clients/customers have. Can theydo better job? Sure. Always room for improvement and that's what we're all hoping to see for our beloved game.
Now as for "Project" team setting precedence and killing the game's fun and competition. No, they did not solely do it. It was slowly getting there. To their defense, their formula is nothing new. Mara did it for quite some time; hence, where they recruited top players from good teams (KoN/Trick, DragonClaws, etc). Schaffa did it also, and so did the top teams like AB, IW and so on. Sh1t, i remember going up against some of these teams and was always losing and was demoralizing. Then again i'm a supernoob so it's my destiny to lose :wink:
Now as for players not wanting to play because of this, that's really on them. I continued to play even though I know the opposing teams are stacked. It's all part of learning. We take our chances, just like WCS 2019. We knew we didn't have a complete team and the "Coalition" (the teams who were against Schaffa) wasn't organize--too many chiefs not enough indians. But we still played. We loss sure but we kept going and playing thereafter. Lessons learned. Just like how it will be when "Project" is gone. Just like how it was when Mara stopped, new team emerge and the cycle repeats.
My last thoughts on "Project" that i'd like to get cleared up, I would say 80% of Project members do not abuse alts for prehitting as many thinks. I would even go far saying 90% since the 10% uses alts only to help in the beginning. Some of these players are really just good players. Some are decent and some are cherry pickers. lol. Well, we all have those. Project was born after WCS 2019 and was a culmination of years of hard work by good leadership (which the Coalition lacked). I did not start for first year and a half with them because I left the game but can honestly say these last 2 servers, I have seen vast improvement from what we wanted the Coalition to be. So Kudos to Bruell & team to be able to bring all the top international players together.
Lastly, do I vote for banning alt use altogether for the sake of keeping this game alive and fun? Absolutely, YES.
**well i have fun with or without them--it's a game after all**. Cheers!
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.
1,182 PostsLatest Activity: 2 days agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 2 days ago
- 4 days ago
- 11 days ago
- 11 days ago