Forum Discussion
anaquarind
9 years agoNew Spectator
freezsol wrote:anaquarind wrote:johde68 wrote:
I've been doing fairly well at Cleatus' . For me, it feels better than Moe's slots. I'm still not sure what the best strategy is. If the red dice were legit your best bets would be 5 or 9. But, from my play so far the dice seem far from legit. I've had string of 3 sets in a row of 11-11-5. I'm also getting more 12's 2's and 3's compared to what be normal for a pair of dice.
Most of the time I'm playing 3,11,5, and 9. 5 and 9 because of pure probability, 3 and 11 because of observation. I haven't been playing 2 and 12 much because their automatic winners if they come up on roll 3 because of cheating.
Not understanding how 5 and 9 have the highest probability here. 7 should be the number thown most frequently with 2 purely randomized, standard dice.
In a pure RNG with the normal odds 7 should be, but I don't think this is pure RNG.
There appears to be patterns to groupings of three rolls. I don't think each roll is individual RNG. I think there is a series of possible three number outcomes that are generated each time you play.
Oh, I agree, I don't think this is a pure model of dice rolling. As I've said at least twice in this thread, there is probably a separate odds table that EA has constructed. Your success is predetermined by that. The actual numbers displayed, and the roll that you win on are probably inconsequential. I wouldn't put any stock in the two numbers you see before you win on the third roll, for example.
Just wondering why johde68 chose 9 and 5 specifically. From a probability standpoint it doesn't seem to make sense, and I don't think anyone could have gotten a high enough n-number for a statistical analysis this fast.
edit - wrong name
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,403 PostsLatest Activity: 5 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 5 hours ago
- 6 hours ago
- 2 days ago