Collect all function

4junk3000 wrote:

jedgeco wrote:

MaxxSpider wrote:
the game is called "Tapped out"

In my country it's called "Collect All-Out."

Then your country is missing out on the "double entendre", as tapped out is an expression meaning physically exhausted.
so it is intentionally tedious to tap everything. But i suspect you know this.

Another meaning of the phrase "tapped out" is "out of money" or "penniless" ... As a premium player, that's the one that I identify with most. ;)
.. Or was that phrase already assumed above?

I posted a poll on this very subject last week. If memory serves, circa 73% of voters wanted this feature in some form.

I expect this to happen in TSTO some day. But it will cost donuts to press that button!

annettemarc wrote:

4junk3000 wrote:

jedgeco wrote:

MaxxSpider wrote:
the game is called "Tapped out"

In my country it's called "Collect All-Out."

Then your country is missing out on the "double entendre", as tapped out is an expression meaning physically exhausted.
so it is intentionally tedious to tap everything. But i suspect you know this.

Another meaning of the phrase "tapped out" is "out of money" or "penniless" ... As a premium player, that's the one that I identify with most. ;)
.. Or was that phrase already assumed above?

That's what I thought the double meaning was. So it's a triple entendre!

Why do people feel the need to bash on good ideas, and use there personal interpretations of "tapped out" to justify their point of view.

...it's called tapped out because it's touch based game, not because you have to tap the screen until your fingers fall off.

...if that was purpose of the game they wouldn't have added features such as moving on to the next friend without having to go back to the friend list, and they'd make us tap every penny and not make them stick around until we tapped every bit of money and XP. I could go if someone doesn't see what I'm getting at.

So please stop using the "tapped out" argument. It's kinda weak, and doesn't prove your point.

AJtheboss1 wrote:
Why do people feel the need to bash on good ideas, and use there personal interpretations of "tapped out" to justify their point of view.

...it's called tapped out because it's touch based game, not because you have to tap the screen until your fingers fall off.

...if that was purpose of the game they wouldn't have added features such as moving on to the next friend without having to go back to the friend list, and they'd make us tap every penny and not make them stick around until we tapped every bit of money and XP. I could go if someone doesn't see what I'm getting at.

So please stop using the "tapped out" argument. It's kinda weak, and doesn't prove your point.

What you call bashing, others call disagreeing passionately.

Personal interpretations are how every person justifies certain points of view. It's called an opinion.

When opinions differ, we can express them passively, or, like you also seem to prefer, aggressively.

i thank you for your feedback, Pot.
-- Kettle

Point is - a LOT of people would like this feature.

We would use it once in a while to keep our game going when real life gets hectic.


Those who don't want the feature? Easy - simply don't use it!

4junk3000 wrote:

AJtheboss1 wrote:
Why do people feel the need to bash on good ideas, and use there personal interpretations of "tapped out" to justify their point of view.

...it's called tapped out because it's touch based game, not because you have to tap the screen until your fingers fall off.

...if that was purpose of the game they wouldn't have added features such as moving on to the next friend without having to go back to the friend list, and they'd make us tap every penny and not make them stick around until we tapped every bit of money and XP. I could go if someone doesn't see what I'm getting at.

So please stop using the "tapped out" argument. It's kinda weak, and doesn't prove your point.

What you call bashing, others call disagreeing passionately.

Personal interpretations are how every person justifies certain points of view. It's called an opinion.

When opinions differ, we can express them passively, or, like you also seem to prefer, aggressively.

i thank you for your feedback, Pot.
-- Kettle

Here's a definition of opinion

a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

As you can see their opinions aren't necessarily right or based on fact. What I'm trying to say is, people should ease off on the "passion" when their claims aren't even based on facts, just personal interpretations of the title. I'm not being aggressive towards anyone. If I was it would clear as day.

What the OP said was a very good suggestion, and all people seem to want to do is bring down a good idea based on their opinions. Sure they have the right to do that, but why do it on something that won't actually hurt them. It'll only make the game easier for everyone.

This is another case of certain people on this forum being backwards. First you have people defending chance based prizes for hard work, completely throwing logic out the window, of being payed for what you do. Now they arguing a proposed feature that would make the game easier by saying it'll defeat the purpose of it by using the title that doesn't even directly mean what they are claiming it to mean. It's making it easier for you! Why argue it? Would you argue if someone said I'll pay you for your work, but you don't have to work as hard as you did before?

I dunno maybe I'm missing something. But I truly don't understand this logic... :?

ottobusdude wrote:
EA don't want you logging in, press one or two buttons then logging out :?

Lol I think there's more to it then just that... :lol:

Igcognita wrote:
I think a collect all button would some what spoil the game. Most times the only thing to do in the game is to collect money. I can't see how missing one or two characters effect the game so much, but then again I can go a few days without collecting anything.
Where's is the fun in easy, if this game gets any easier it would be very dull.

Finally someone with a valid argument! :lol:

I guess if the option is there, it wouldn't necessarily have to be used. None the less it's a very good point!