Dead characters or no dead characters [poll]
How is it sacrificing the story if they were to add deceased characters from the show?
Forum Discussion
- Oh look at this walter, you are catching up.
So, aside from the whole the town never blew up and everyone died and came back is not part of the Simpsons canon in the first place so this whole argument is pointless....so aside from that I was thinking. You do not want Maude back because Ned is with Edna in the current series. But, now I hope you are sitting, but prepare to have your mind blown, in this game Edna is in her apartment....so why, if they are together is she there? Yes they had one dinner in game, but that is it, nothing else. I think this is more the alternate universe, and because of that Maude should be back. - I honestly dont mind what characters they bring back from the dead as it were :) it is a game after all, and doesnt have to be true to the show in anyway :)
- Sorry, but Edna has her tasks there, no, not just still a lease....no, sorry walter, the whole she is married to Ned thing does not hold for the game anymore. Hal Roach apartments would be another apartment building.
No, sadly you have to swallow the bitter bitter pill that this game diverges from present day show, Edna's apartment being the proof.
I officially close this argument as won by us and lost by yours. mdfriend wrote:
Sorry, but Edna has her tasks there, no, not just still a lease....no, sorry walter, the whole she is married to Ned thing does not hold for the game anymore. Hal Roach apartments would be another apartment building.
No, sadly you have to swallow the bitter bitter pill that this game diverges from present day show, Edna's apartment being the proof.
I officially close this argument as won by us and lost by yours.
waltercartman - Its a choice you will have to make.....which pill you gonna choose?? :lol:
Blue Pill being you ideas OR Red Pill being MD's ???.......Free your mind :lol:- We win :mrgreen:
waltercartman wrote:
Wrong. You can feel like you won but her quest in the game prove I won.
Her apartment was just a way to get her into the game. Bart doesn't live in his tree house yet you don't bring that up. Heck I can say this for almost all of the building and people in the game.
You proved nothing you loose good day sir :)
Who said Bart lives in his treehouse, he has a sleepover in it. Besides, not sure where that goes to proving that this game is not canon, it is not canon.....it is outside of that, so bart living in his treehouse as you point out furthers that this is not canon.
What quest in the game does she have that proves it?
Loose, hey just because I have slept around does not make me loose.Deadshot_DCU wrote:
We win :mrgreen:
I was hoping that you were online and seeing this. It struck me last night, wait, she is not with Ned in the game, she has her own place, the whole premise is shot for his argument.waltercartman wrote:
Deadshot_DCU wrote:
We win :mrgreen:
Really show me Maude in your game.....
Oh wait you mean she's not in there? How is that? I thought you won... Well the way it looks to me is I won or am winning.
It is not about Maude in the game it is about the potential that she could be and for some should be.
Part of your argument was that Ned has moved on in the series to which we say this is not canon to the series to which you say it is. The above argument is just showing it is not canon to the show as Edna still lives alone, without Ned, in her apartment. Therefore we win, she is not with Ned, this is not canon and na na a boo boo, stick your head in poo poo. Seriously though, it would seem that they are not in line with the series. I still want a Maude, Ned, Edna sexy storyline, with Frank Grimes as the foil.waltercartman wrote:
The game stays true to the show. Heck the game has quest that go with shows. The fat tony one is a perfect one.
I have said all of this before so I don't need to keep repeating myself.
Fact is there are no dead people in the game. If there was then I would have no legs to stand on but guess what there isn't.
As of right now I win!!!
You may all bow down to my greatness ;)
But there could be....and that is all we are saying, COULD be. The game does not stay true to the show, ie, Edna and her mothfawking apartment, or wait, the game stays true to the show in whatever timeline it so chooses, be it fit to fat Tony or some apartment from the past. Again, you prove our point.
Yes, fact is there are no dead people now. That is not part of the argument. Quit throwing logical fallacies at us. The bottom line is the game does not follow any timeline but its own as based on the whole opening of this game, something that has never happened in show. Edna has her apartment in this game, fact....again inconsistency with current timeline of show, showing this does not follow that timeline.
Remember the argument is not if there are or are not dead people, but if they should be (survey here says yes). The argument dovetailed into that it is not part of the show, again, proving here that this game is not tied to the show. Ergo, again, you are wrong, Deadshot scores and wins.- I am a huge simpson fan. If they should add dead characters, it would feel a bit.. kinda off.
And as many other have said already. There are MANY characters in the simpons. Nearly 200. So why add dead ones?
