Forum Discussion
8 years ago
"wadebear;1579018" wrote:"AARONRTD;1579001" wrote:
The gold train would be wayyyy lighter.
A locomotive - an actual working locomotive and not just an object that looked like a locomotive - made of gold would require the same amount of metal that a locomotive made of steel would. So the one made of gold would weigh more.
2. When you're comparing the weight of 2 things you have to use a common weight system. So a pound of gold and a pound of feathers both weigh a pound - they just weigh that pound in which ever system of measurement you use.
1: A 1 inch cube (1x1x1) of steel lest say = 1lb (16oz)
So a 1 inch cube (1x1x1) of gold would be 1troy lb (12oz)
What you're saying is I need to rewrite 100's or 1000's of years of measurement systems just so as not to confuse you when asked a trick question.
But I'd be happy to by a pound of gold off you all (16oz) at the current market value of 1 pound of gold (12oz) heck I might splurge and get 2.
2. Next you'll say that the gold train has to be as strong as a steel train, so that would increase the overall size and weight and be heavier than the steel one (yeh you win the argument).
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,415 PostsLatest Activity: 31 days agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 4 days ago
- 13 days ago
- 14 days ago
- 14 days ago
- 15 days ago