House of Cards Pattern

someonewashere wrote:

4junk3000 wrote:
Your first post is to tell us that there must be some pattern, but you don't actually know what it is, but that we should look for it?

This info should really help we WIN Tapped Out now. Thanks!!

THIS, this right here is why i think i give you a hard time, you asked in that "stop bumping useless threads" thread why people give you a hard time when you do it but are more lenient when others do it?

you are right the op provided no info and it seems unnecessary but your post is much less necessary and its less constructive, just constructive criticism.

However the OP has a point there, allow me to make a theory, like all previous games dice den, slots, this game doesnt work with real world logic, instead it just gives you preset results. I cant prove this because you dont know the value of the other 5 cards but it seems that choosing is pointless just choose 5 cards the outcome will be the same regardless of which 5 out of 10 cards you choose.

The real pattern is: if you don notice a pattern by the 3 card flipped you'll probably lose, which is basic common sense.

Guess wr could all chose the middle ones and a corner and see if a pattern emerges,if it does it's predetermijed, if not, random

Given what I've seen from the other games, the game is probably designed to be as easily programmed as possible. I'm keeping some stats on it to get a better idea, but likely the game works like this:

- when you start, the game randomly picks which end prize you get (including cheats).
- for the prized that is picked, the game chooses one of a few set sequences to make up that prize.
- as you pick cards, the card that you flip over is forced to be one of the set that is chosen (thus, which cards you pick or what order you choose is irrelevant).

In this way, the programmers don't have to try to simulate a random card shuffling algorithm, or have to try to calculate the card probabilities to balance all 3 of the games, so it's a lot easier to program and control, but still seems random.

Anyway, this is just my own personal speculation. Perhaps someone will be able to prove my right (or wrong). If so, I'd be curious to see how it really works.

0blique wrote:
Given what I've seen from the other games, the game is probably designed to be as easily programmed as possible. I'm keeping some stats on it to get a better idea, but likely the game works like this:

- when you start, the game randomly picks which end prize you get (including cheats).
- for the prized that is picked, the game chooses one of a few set sequences to make up that prize.
- as you pick cards, the card that you flip over is forced to be one of the set that is chosen (thus, which cards you pick or what order you choose is irrelevant).

In this way, the programmers don't have to try to simulate a random card shuffling algorithm, or have to try to calculate the card probabilities to balance all 3 of the games, so it's a lot easier to program and control, but still seems random.

Anyway, this is just my own personal speculation. Perhaps someone will be able to prove my right (or wrong). If so, I'd be curious to see how it really works.

This is what i think as well, you simply had a better eloquence with words i understand that some things have patterns but others are already rigged from the beginning, while some believe pressing the "B" button while a pokemon is inside a pokeball will help capture it, most know its simply a myth.

Same here the game was rigged from the start, to our favor however, but rigged nonetheless. The payout kinda sucks so i'll stick to dice and slots, slots seems to be better at getting higher pays while dice is easier to force out a win.

@someone. If i think a thread here is pointless, such as this one with a title suggesting there's information about a pattern, but there isn't, I'll say so. If you want to give me a hard time about that, then you're entitled to express your pointless opinion just like me.

But my frustration up there was, if they haven't actually discovered a pattern to report to the group, how about a question mark in the title, to prevent people from wasting their time opening a thread with no helpful info?

So If the bumped thread then wasted your time, much like a three car pile up, do you blame the guy stuck in the middle, or the guy up front who caused it??

Meanwhile,

Much like in the KL balloon game, it doesn't matter which balloons you actually tap. There aren't individually assigned values for each balloon. There's one total value for that session of playing it. You couldn't change the outcome it you were able to pick a different balloon.

Finally, it's irrelevant. Just log in and play the requisite amount and you'll get the prizes. Or don't, and it's OK because it's just a game.

I think it doesn't matter which card you open, you will have the determined combination anyway. Same way as Sideshow You works.

Furthermore, I think it really doesn't matter which game you play, the income is more or less the same, around 100-110 chips pro token.

I played 15 games and made a log just for fun, but it is not really funny, because takes tooooooooo much time to write it down. :mrgreen:
http://i.imgur.com/EVMaWb2.png

Edit: opened all five cards in an upper row.

It is unlikely thst there is any combination that can be detected. Most likely all the combinations are in a list ( array or table for you programmers). When you initiate the play, you simply pick the next entry in the list. It does not matter which card you pick, it has alrsady been predetermined at this point..

So it would be random, since when you play determines which combination you receive.

At least this is the way, i would program it. Trying to determine a random for each card woulx be time consuming

I have gotten 400 twice, with something called (I think) a "Royal Sequence". Basically, it's all red cards. It would be a worthless hand in real poker, because it's diamonds and hearts.

Anyone else gotten this? It's not in the list. :?

lynnmckenz82 wrote:
I have gotten 400 twice, with something called (I think) a "Royal Sequence". Basically, it's all red cards. It would be a worthless hand in real poker, because it's diamonds and hearts.

Anyone else gotten this? It's not in the list. :?

I got 5 garbage cards that made no sense called Royal sequence too. Since it paid out 400 chips, I wasn't going to complain.

BlackFloppyDisk wrote:

lynnmckenz82 wrote:
I have gotten 400 twice, with something called (I think) a "Royal Sequence". Basically, it's all red cards. It would be a worthless hand in real poker, because it's diamonds and hearts.

Anyone else gotten this? It's not in the list. :?

I got 5 garbage cards that made no sense called Royal sequence too. Since it paid out 400 chips, I wasn't going to complain.

This is just one of the cheating options. You have worthless hand but Homer sees it different. :) Second option is a Blackjack.

First and foremost - WELCOME TO THE FORUM! This is a friendly welcoming community, and we're glad you joined us (where is JimJ when we need him?).

Now that, that's out of the way...

http://i.imgur.com/QuEqx8c.gif