Forum Discussion
12 years ago
JoshSherer wrote:
Donna and Land get it.
They got it, and what about me... Did I somehow miss it...?
Anyway, the debate about if limited items should reappear or not, is perhaps the most polarised continuing debate on this forum. There has been alot of threads about this in the past, and I suppose there will be more in the future.
Here are some links to other threads that is about the same topic:
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/9540116.page
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/9697521.page
In this second thread my first post (the 7th and perhaps too long for a forum) sums up most of the arguments from the first thread I linked to. And my point of view, which coincide with JoshSheerer, Donna4612, Land0fComedy, DIrishB, Excruciator69 and surely many others, got alot of heat. There is also many people on these forums digging firepits for the other side (though why that happens I'm never going to understand).
However Donna is completely correct. If limited items reappear to be available for new players, that means some of the storylines in theory good get continued, even for characters you have had for some time. Would someone really hate that?
I have to adress this to all older players that doesn't think the old limited items should reappear: HOW does it affect YOUR game, if newer players can get some of the old items? There's never anyone answering this with a valid answer...
I'm with Josh and Donna here, the characters are the most important in this game, and you should get the chance to get them all. That means Shauna, Kang, Tom O'Flannagan and even Rex Banner and Abraham Lincoln should all reappear sometime in the future.
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,404 PostsLatest Activity: 7 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 7 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago