deomegus wrote:
Michael Schumacher is statistically the best ever
308 starts
91 wins
68 pole positions
155 podiums
7x world champion-1994,1995,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004
But in pure racing talent, ayrton senna was the best ever, absolutely unbelievable quick especially in the wet and when you look at how many races Michael Schumacher has done, compared to senna. Senna had neally as many poles in almost half the period and his podium percentage is almost 50%, means almost half the races he enterd he finished at lest in the top 3. Mega impressive,but don't get me wrong Michael Schumacher was almost unbeatable in his prime.
i was wondering how he would stack up against schumacher if still alive. would he have de-throned him as the michael jordan of F1?
Oh yeah he was just faster than Schumacher. Schumacher needs the best car or near the best, to be quick and win. While senna could basically win in anything, they have raced against each other from 1991 when Michael Schumacher first came into the scene and up until his death. People think and including senna and Williams, accused Schumacher and Benetton for running an illegal traction control system, which have Schumacher the edge. Senna was supposed to join Ferrari in 1996 instead of Schumacher, so who knows what would have happened. But I've seen some purely fantastic performances from Schumacher aswel, finishing 2nd in the 1994 Spanish gp while stuck in 5th gear and his 13wins in a season in 2003 just pure dominance in that perspective.