Currently, there is a bug where long-range launchers fired at moving targets travel straight toward the target, similar to anti-air launchers.
In severe cases, it may fly downwards initially, potentially plunging into the water or striking the ground right in front of you.
Since the missile follows a normal trajectory against stationary targets, I would like you to ensure that it flies correctly toward all attackable targets.
Don’t waste your time with anti-air weapons — they’re all a complete disaster. The game clearly feels heavily biased toward players using helicopters and jets. Ground-based anti-air systems are practically useless when they can’t reliably track or hit moving aircraft, while missiles can behave completely incorrectly and even crash into the ground or water.
An anti-air missile should be enough to take down a helicopter or jet. You shouldn’t have to fire 3 or 4 missiles just to bring down a single helicopter. That’s an absolute joke.
Fix the **bleep** guidance, targeting, and damage systems. Anti-air weapons should actually be effective against aircraft instead of feeling completely useless. Right now, the whole system is a badly designed mess that heavily favors players using helicopters and jets.
I play in the Asia (Japan) region, and I have never felt that anti-air missiles were useless.
I occasionally pilot helicopters and jets myself; if I get targeted by a lock-on launcher, I have to pop flares and quickly duck behind cover—like a mountain—or flee as far away as possible.
Since it is impossible to attack the enemy while on the move, this need to retreat gives enemy ground forces an opening to advance.
Why not view these weapons not merely as tools for annihilation, but as a means to keep the enemy wary and halt their advance?
Speaking as a pilot, surface-to-air missiles are a real nuisance. Even having just a single one fired at you is a major hassle.
