Lying/Wrong Attachment Descriptions and Statistics, Especially on M240L

There have been many attachments corrected, but some are still there, most noticeably on the M240L.

The 75 round magasine which is an increase from the stock default 50, claims to improve weapon draw speed (NOT increase, IMPROVE) as well as ADS accuracy while moving, even though it is heavier than the default and all heavier magazines would increase and worsen these things on every other weapon normally.

The stats then also show a green increase to the mobility bar, thus both the description and statistics are (assumingly) lying and incorrect, unless it is somehow designed upside down in contrast to every other weapons attachments and actually is true?

Either way, it is too small of a difference for me to notice whether it worsens or improves these aspects, as with most attachments on most guns. Thus a developer needs to investigate this within the source code etc.

Not to mention the 100 magasinze attachment which has a description that claims to REDUCE reload speed, thus making it faster, but it is obviously much slower than the 50 belt.

Then there is also another anomaly within the barrels section, now this may very well be true but it is still something I haven't seen in any other weapon, the default barrel does not improve ADS time yet the light barrel does. I am unsure of whether this is actually the case or not as it is only by 67 milliseconds, please investigate.

If I pay 100 euros for a game I at least expect the attachments to not lie to my face. Call of Duty is a great example of a perfect weapons attachment and statistics system, there we can see even more highly detailed facts about the weapons.