Fig1 and Fig2 in the attached image show the results of the match.
Fig3 shows the player who was selected as “Player of the Match” for that match.
LUNA, who scored 8 points and received a rating of 10.0 in the match, was the deciding factor in the victory.
Are the selection criteria for “Player of the Match” correct?
No matter how many times I try, it's the same.
Is this correct?
Played for 10 minutes, scored 8 goals, and received a rating of 10.0. The match ended in an 8-1 victory. Players who played until the end of the match received a rating of 10.0. Even if they played until the end of the match, if they conceded a goal, they would have lost without the 8 goals. Isn't the player who played for 10 minutes and was substituted the Player of the Match?
In the first place, even if a player is highly rated during the game, they cannot win the Player of the Match award if they are substituted midway through the game.
Isn't that an incorrect assessment?
Are you really looking at the performance of players who are substituted midway through the game?
You're definitely ignoring that, aren't you?
The Ballon d'Or assessment was also incorrect, wasn't it?
Is this the correct result?
It's wrong every time.
