Bring back Battlefield 2 and Bad Company 3
It seems EA/DICE is really good at making games run on the same maps forever. BF 6 is using several BF maps from older versions such as BF 3 and BF 4. Why not redo BF 2 (at least the maps) and add the destruction. Make the helicopters and jets flyable like the original Battlefield 2 without the overlapping controls. Set the game so a person can actually practice on maps on their own using a single player option like Battlefield 2 had. Maps are a big thing for me and many others. El Alamein, strike at Karkand and other maps would be nice to see. Just a thought I’ve had for years. Maybe even bring back Battlefield Vietnam and/or 1942. I’m sorry, I just think the maps on Battlefield 2 may have been a little bigger than what’s available with Battlefield 6 and more fun the way they were laid out.
EA is atrociously annoying
I bought battlefield 1 revolution, but can't play it because your anti cheat doesn't support steam deck (proton/wine) I then heard your battlefront star wars games don't have this new annoying anti cheat so I bought those. Again, I'm forced to open your stupif ea app which isn't supported on gamehub which uses proton/wine. I bought the game on steam yet I can't even play the game OFFLINE. What exactly are we allowed to play from you guys? So **bleep** steam deck and Linux in general I guess?
Battlefield 3 Activation Error
When i wan't to join to a server via Battlelog, i got this message, i tried everything, deleting Logs,restart pc,uninstalling the game,uninstalling the EA App, tried with VU client, but the same problem... i played this game 10+ years ago with my old pc there was no problem with it..Battlefield 1943 deserves...
Battlefield 1943 is still an epic game with a fan base that it deserves to be relooked at. One solution to the shutting down servers for this specific game should be having BF 1943 added to each new BF game as an embedded game. That WOULD be a win win for the company and the players that love that game. Its the only game i played for 10 straight years. Nothing else compares for me. But i would BUY newer Battlefield games just to be able to continue playing. I'm not even asking for new maps or anything else. Just include it on each new Battlefield game as an extra "mini game" embedded. This would actually boost sales as well. In a perfect world, we would be able to download BF 1943 and have AI opponents (as a last resort if multiplayer isnt possible) but there has got to be something for the loyal BF 1943 fans.STEAMDECK support
I know when I first had the steamdeck, I was able to play all Battlefield games, but suddenly they pulled the plug and support for Battlefield in the steamdeck. I just wanted to play multiplayer anywhere I go again in any Battlefield, heck, it could possibly run Battlefield 6 if they let support reach to it once again!
what if cheats became a handicap instead of an advantage?
Hi everyone, I’ve been thinking about this: let’s assume cheaters will always find a way to bypass traditional anti-cheat detection. If that’s the case, maybe it makes more sense to stop chasing them only on the detection side and instead try to make cheats useless—or even turn them into a handicap. The idea would be to add a layer of deception: Server-side decoys visible only to suspicious clients – for example, NPCs or off-map anchor points that a wallhack would show as real, misleading cheaters into making wrong moves. Random fake targets during events like death, respawn, or loading – for legit players it’s just a transition screen, but for someone with an aimbot it looks like a real target, and the auto-aim might snap to it. Invisible “probe players” with unnatural movements (zig-zag, sharp curves) – a human wouldn’t react, but an aimbot might track them, revealing suspicious behavior. The system wouldn’t have to issue instant bans, but instead could gather evidence over multiple events and apply progressive mitigations. This way, cheats become less reliable, and cheat developers would need to invest more effort and resources just to keep them functional. What do you think? Is this just a silly idea, or could it actually help strengthen existing anti-cheat systems?Please bring back Battlefield 1943
It's been almost 2 years since the servers were taken offline and there has been no game like it since. Drop in/drop out with rock, paper, siccors weapon mechanics, no level up advantages, and arcade style gameplay. All EA would have to do is upgrade the textures and they could sell it for $40. Heck if EA really wanted to milk this is could just port the 3 original maps and release it as free to play but then sell DLC for more maps and game modes (though if done incorrectly it could hurt the game). I still have the game saved on my ps3, 360, and Series X in hopes that the servers might get turned back on someday. Even the r/battlefield1943 sub reddit is still active.
My least favorite BF Games, My favorite BF Games:
My least favorite BF Games: 1 BF 2042 themed, weapons, bugs, player count, no cover, maps were too open, maps were too big, no campaign. 2 BF Hardline themed, weapons, Bugs 3 BF 2142 themed, weapons, Bugs 8 BF5 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 9 BF4 bugs 10 BF1 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 4 BF Heroes lack of gameplay 5 BF2 modern combat two was just ok My favorite BF Games: 1 BF Bad company 1 2 BF Bad company 2 3 BF3 4 BF4 5 BF1 themed 6 BF 1942 7 BF 1943 8 BF5 themed 9 BF2An argument for micro transactions and how they can potentially be awesome.
Tyler Andrew Vargas John Bassilone Desmond Dos David Goggins Shrek John macafee Henry Johnson Harlem Hellfighter Jake Mcniece 761st tank Battalion ( The black panthers) USE THE FRICKIN PATTON QUOTE creasy Alvin York Major James Capers Jr Dynamite **bleep** MACV-SOG Americans Samurai 442nd Infantry Ben Kenilahie Polynesian American WW1 vet stops Japanese pilot during ww2. Honestly just go through American history and pick not only the most honorable but shocking as well. And make the skins based off of the history and have a campaign type mission to unlock the character and or weapons. Also they should do an event where the game mode is almost like arma but make it based off historical missions like John bassilon have them be wildly outnumbered just so people can realize just how hard it would actually be to pull off what people actually pulled off in history. I miss playing early call of duty and not only feeling like I’m playing as a real person but also learning different quotes or parts of history. Also it completely legitimizes the poc in gaming like we have a Navy seal astronaut doctor asian guy kids should be aware of him and be inspired by that. What’s really going on in gaming is the community wants to be seen they feel like a number and nothing more I feel implementing real history in game will strengthen the community and make it feel real that’s really what people are craving and authenticity can’t be faked so use real people and real history. I know using peoples likeness could be potentially difficult and that’s why I suggest it’s a part of a long lasting charity effort going to someone like Wounded Warrior. Personally I’m a Marine and I know for sure there’s guys and girls of all races who deserve wide spread acknowledgment. Plus there are some very cool missions that can be made and I think battlefield would do it best. I think every young man in America should be able to recognize Tyler Vargas. You could tell the whole story if you wanted to and it’s all adjacent to the existing battlefield lore and I’m Sure AI will make this infinitely easier I’d love to see this and if done right I think Battlefield would quickly become Americas game and then the worlds. I don’t think cod stands a chance against bf6 but this would slam the knife into cod and could extend BF6’s lifespan by a lot potentially making battlefield a every two year game and I think everyone would appreciate that much more both consumers and creators.
