STEAMDECK support
I know when I first had the steamdeck, I was able to play all Battlefield games, but suddenly they pulled the plug and support for Battlefield in the steamdeck. I just wanted to play multiplayer anywhere I go again in any Battlefield, heck, it could possibly run Battlefield 6 if they let support reach to it once again!
Bring back Battlefield 2 and Bad Company 3
It seems EA/DICE is really good at making games run on the same maps forever. BF 6 is using several BF maps from older versions such as BF 3 and BF 4. Why not redo BF 2 (at least the maps) and add the destruction. Make the helicopters and jets flyable like the original Battlefield 2 without the overlapping controls. Set the game so a person can actually practice on maps on their own using a single player option like Battlefield 2 had. Maps are a big thing for me and many others. El Alamein, strike at Karkand and other maps would be nice to see. Just a thought I’ve had for years. Maybe even bring back Battlefield Vietnam and/or 1942. I’m sorry, I just think the maps on Battlefield 2 may have been a little bigger than what’s available with Battlefield 6 and more fun the way they were laid out.EA is atrociously annoying
I bought battlefield 1 revolution, but can't play it because your anti cheat doesn't support steam deck (proton/wine) I then heard your battlefront star wars games don't have this new annoying anti cheat so I bought those. Again, I'm forced to open your stupif ea app which isn't supported on gamehub which uses proton/wine. I bought the game on steam yet I can't even play the game OFFLINE. What exactly are we allowed to play from you guys? So **bleep** steam deck and Linux in general I guess?
Battlefield 3 Activation Error
When i wan't to join to a server via Battlelog, i got this message, i tried everything, deleting Logs,restart pc,uninstalling the game,uninstalling the EA App, tried with VU client, but the same problem... i played this game 10+ years ago with my old pc there was no problem with it..
what if cheats became a handicap instead of an advantage?
Hi everyone, I’ve been thinking about this: let’s assume cheaters will always find a way to bypass traditional anti-cheat detection. If that’s the case, maybe it makes more sense to stop chasing them only on the detection side and instead try to make cheats useless—or even turn them into a handicap. The idea would be to add a layer of deception: Server-side decoys visible only to suspicious clients – for example, NPCs or off-map anchor points that a wallhack would show as real, misleading cheaters into making wrong moves. Random fake targets during events like death, respawn, or loading – for legit players it’s just a transition screen, but for someone with an aimbot it looks like a real target, and the auto-aim might snap to it. Invisible “probe players” with unnatural movements (zig-zag, sharp curves) – a human wouldn’t react, but an aimbot might track them, revealing suspicious behavior. The system wouldn’t have to issue instant bans, but instead could gather evidence over multiple events and apply progressive mitigations. This way, cheats become less reliable, and cheat developers would need to invest more effort and resources just to keep them functional. What do you think? Is this just a silly idea, or could it actually help strengthen existing anti-cheat systems?
My least favorite BF Games, My favorite BF Games:
My least favorite BF Games: 1 BF 2042 themed, weapons, bugs, player count, no cover, maps were too open, maps were too big, no campaign. 2 BF Hardline themed, weapons, Bugs 3 BF 2142 themed, weapons, Bugs 8 BF5 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 9 BF4 bugs 10 BF1 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 4 BF Heroes lack of gameplay 5 BF2 modern combat two was just ok My favorite BF Games: 1 BF Bad company 1 2 BF Bad company 2 3 BF3 4 BF4 5 BF1 themed 6 BF 1942 7 BF 1943 8 BF5 themed 9 BF2
