Battlefield V deserves more content
I understand that the game is no longer being supported by EA, let alone shown any proper support. And I think they should at least reconsider and give Battlefield V a second chance. Let's start with the basics, I've seen several videos and many of the videos that talk about Battlefield 2042 are the same, the absence of fluidity and consistency in the basics of the game, an example, in BFV it is visible to know when a kill has actually been made on the enemy, it already leaves something guaranteed, in 2042 it presents an absence of this or it is a VERY small and almost imperceptible detail. The "complex" part is the fact that Battlefield V had a troubled start due to the fact that it made extreme historical flaws or even tried to add some things to be "inclusive", but the fact is that it backfired and damaged the start of the game, a detail was the fact that some developers or even members of EA or DICE who have a degree of relevance for communicating with the public, decided to respond to criticism in the worst possible way and further damaged the image of the game. A failure to include a female combatant in the game, in a WWII setting, is what has upset some players too much (I have nothing against it, but within the setting, I thought it was unnecessary), some of the game's elites may have helped in some way, either positively or negatively, an example is the elite character who is a woman, BUT she is from the French resistance, in which there really were women combatants in WWII, from the resistance, and not as standard army soldiers on the front lines, if history is not the strong suit of some people, women worked more as nurses and mechanics, far from the fronts. This would be easily fixed if they at least reconsidered these small flaws and holes within the historical part of the war, because some players (the vast majority) notice when historical inaccuracies occur, Battlefield 1 was a fine example of a game that was totally immersed in the history of the first world war, and why did they decide to make such bad choices with Battlefield V? Now comes the boring part, glitches and bugs, the main bug that has been known is the ABUSIVE use of the flawed mechanics of a newly placed weapon, which are the anti-matter rifles, in which when using the hawkins bomb (demolition grenade) and when you pick it up again , but without releasing the button that interacts with the bomb, the anti-matter rifles become semi-automatic with an extremely high rate of fire, literally a spam, becoming the favorite weapon of tank destroyers and abusers (obtaining very high kill counts thanks to the bug), now for the visual glitch, the characters sometimes don't render and become almost like modeling clay, becoming freaks (so ugly they are) and even becoming an internal meme because of this, even when combat against an enemy is involved, their character doesn't render, or even some mounted weapons, both vehicles and stationary, don't render, becoming weapons with graphics similar to their former games, such as "Medal of Honor" and "Medal of Honor Underground" (for PS1). And to finish, the question of content, within some files of the game, thanks to the players who explore every detail of the files, it was in mind that the game has cosmetics that are part of the Russian faction of the game the, USSR, but it was never implemented the campaign in Europe going towards Russia, or known as Ostheer, Ostheer was the "eastern front", and what annoys me is the fact that you decided to cancel support for the game with an excuse, without wanting to sound rude, a PATHETIC excuse saying that the game did not meet sales expectations, blaming marketing, is it because it was not the terrible decisions coming from you or even pure incompetence? Seriously, I was surprised every time I looked at some cosmetic in the game, especially on the German side, which had something totally to do with real divisions that existed and that I didn't know about, like the Volksturm (with no cosmetics that refer to them unfortunately) or even something I didn't expect, which was the "werwolf" cosmetic that was about a "resistance division of the SS" that acted as saboteurs even after the end of the war, but in the end they were classified as terrorists since the war was already over, and the biggest disrespect that was shown was to add items that had very significant connections to the war on the Russian front, like the mosin nagant that was modified to be a hand mortar, and some helmets that are part of or have connections to the Russian side.Even not adding more locations where battles took place, such as the Battle of the Bulge, the Battle of Okinawa, the Normandy Beach Invasion (D-Day), the Battle of Stalingrad, how can you put on a WWII game without mentioning one of the most important moments that helped change the course of the war, which was D-Day, or even the Battle of Stalingrad?! I, as a player who LOVES Battlefield, believe that you should give the game, Battlefield V, a second chance, give the game the true potential that it hasn't really been given, if for you, EA or DICE employees it doesn't sound like something important, remember that Battlefield V still has more active players than your most current game, remove the female characters (except for the elites who have some connection to the history of the second war or some fidelity to what really happened), fixing the bugs, and adding new things would already give the game a new look, even bringing back the old character editing system (because people loved it when they could leave their favorite faction as the background in the main menu, which was removed for no reason), the marketing of the game at the beginning was horrible and really had a negative impact, along with unprofessional responses to criticism, and the unnecessary focus on battle royale mode (which so far I haven't found anyone who plays it), think about it. ... and if the game had had the same first trailer as when they announced the Pacific War chapter, do you think they wouldn't have done better? So that's my point of view...it's a mixture of venting and a request, even though I'm not important, a lot of people think the same way....read this, everyone, regardless of being from EA or DICE, being affiliated with it or anything like that, and think...is it fair to let a game with such great potential die, because of bad decisions or even pure greed? That's what I think... Battlefield V deserves to be able to show its true potential, which is now hidden, waiting to be unearthed.
Battlefield 5 PS5 – Unable to Join Servers (Connection Timed Out)
Hello, I’m experiencing an issue when trying to join servers on Battlefield 5 on my PS5. I haven’t played for a few months, but when I tried to join a server today, I kept getting disconnected with the following error message: “Connection to EA Online timed out. Your bandwidth and/or network latency may not meet the requirements for this game.” However, I have a very good internet connection, and I am able to join games through quick play, but I cannot manually select a game from the server browser. I’ve tried multiple solutions, including: Restarting my WiFi router Connecting via both Ethernet and WiFi Deleting and reinstalling the game Confirming that my PlayStation account is correctly linked to my EA account Additionally, after I receive the error message and press X to continue, the game gets stuck on a grayish background with the menu music playing, forcing me to restart the game entirely. Despite these efforts, the issue persists, and I’m unsure what else to try. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
