L1 triangle or lob passes
The insane amount of meh players only spamming these passes instead of trying to play the game is just dumb and all because yall dont know how to balance the game. Why is allot of the broken mechanics all to do with long balls or counter attacking playstyle. Balance the bloody game Jesus bro. I lose against player playing for a lucky over the top ball with no intention of actually building anything up and what do yall do take the profit and F the game up even more afterwards. Do yall not have anybody in that building of yall who knows something about football? GADAMNNNNNNNNTime for a serious conversation about Gem SBCs
Have Streamlined/GEM SBCs actually made Player SBCs worse? As a very long-time Ultimate Team player, I have to say that this year's introduction of GEM/Streamlined SBCs is starting to have the opposite effect on me from what I assume was intended. Rather than increasing my engagement with Player SBCs, I'm finding myself avoiding them. To be clear, I don't dislike the Streamlined SBC system itself. For certain types of SBCs, I actually think it works really well. For upgrade SBCs, re-rolls and things like TOTW upgrades, it's perfect. Being able to throw cards in without worrying about chemistry, positions or constructing an entire squad makes those SBCs genuinely quicker and easier. That's where I can see the benefit of the new system. My issue is using the same system for expensive Player SBCs and POTMs. Once a Player SBC starts requiring 250,000 GEM/Item Score or more, I don't find the experience streamlined at all. If you're trying to complete it as cheaply as possible, you can end up submitting considerably more individual players. You're basically feeding card after card into a progress bar until eventually you reach the required total. Yes, it's simpler than building traditional squads. But is it actually quicker or more enjoyable? For me, no. That's where I think the old Player SBC system was better. Previously, an expensive Player SBC might have required an 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88-rated squad. You completed each section and normally received a pack back along the way. Those packs might not have been amazing, but they mattered. You could get some fodder back, potentially pack something valuable and put those cards straight into the next squad. I always considered those packs when working out the true cost of completing a Player SBC. More importantly, they gave you little rewards and milestones while working towards the player. With a large Streamlined SBC, it can feel more like: Submit → Submit → Submit → Submit → Submit → Player There's very little encouragement along the way. And that's probably the biggest indication for me that something isn't working. Last year I completed loads of Player SBCs. In FC 27, I've only completed the Premier League POTM so far. So while Streamlined SBCs have technically removed some of the difficulty from completing SBCs, they've actually reduced my desire to do them. How I'd change it Personally, I'd use different systems depending on the type and value of the SBC. Streamlined/GEM SBCs: Keep them for upgrades, re-rolls, TOTW upgrades, cheap players and other repeatable content. Traditional squad SBCs: Bring them back for expensive Player SBCs and premium POTMs, particularly once you're getting into the 200k to 250k+ GEM range. Or even better, create a hybrid system. For example, if a Player SBC costs 300,000 GEM: 75k GEM → Pack reward 150k GEM → Pack reward 225k GEM → Pack reward 300k GEM → Player You'd still get all the benefits of Streamlined SBCs, such as using duplicates, submitting gradually and not worrying about chemistry, but you'd also bring back some of the reward and progression that traditional Player SBCs had. For me, Streamlined works brilliantly when the content actually suits it. The problem is trying to make every type of SBC fit the same system. The new system may have removed the squad-building grind, but for expensive players I feel like it's simply replaced it with a card-submission grind. I'd be interested to know how everyone else feels: Do you prefer traditional squad-based Player SBCs with packs returned, or the new GEM system? Do you think Streamlined SBCs work when they're being used for expensive POTM cards? Would milestone pack rewards improve GEM SBCs? Most importantly, compared with last year, are you completing more, fewer or roughly the same number of Player SBCs? For me personally, it's significantly fewer, which makes me wonder whether Streamlined SBCs are actually achieving what they were supposed to achieveStick Drift
Hello guys can someone please reply and let me know. So i was doing the new cala ucl SBC and i by accendlity submitted my 86 preorder icon heath. and this was due to my stick drift. im pretty pressed abt it but i would wanna know if i will still get the upgraded version of her please help guys this is the first time this happen to me
Spent Real Money on FC 27 Packs, Still Haven't Packed a Single Promo Card
I've spent real money buying FC Points and opening Store Packs in FC 27, and to this day, I haven't received a SINGLE promotional card from any of the paid packs I've opened. Not one. I understand that pack probabilities exist and that nothing is guaranteed. I'm not expecting the best player every time I open a pack. But seriously, how much money is someone supposed to spend before they get something even remotely exciting? EA keeps releasing expensive Store Packs, but the rewards I've received have been consistently disappointing. I've never opened one of these paid packs and thought, "WOW, that was actually worth the money." I genuinely want to know whether other players are experiencing the same thing. Does EA evaluate customer satisfaction with paid packs? Why does spending real money on Ultimate Team feel so unrewarding? I'm not asking for guaranteed elite players. I'm questioning whether the current paid pack system provides reasonable value to the people supporting this game financially. If you've experienced the same thing, please share your experience here. And if someone from EA sees this discussion, I'd appreciate a response beyond simply saying that pack contents are probability-based.
Why do you make so annoying
Gameplay all responses delayed passing is a nightmare I’d be lucky if the pass went where am I pointing packs gets me the worst cards it looks like you are pushing us away from the game Store packs gets me always less then 20% of the pack value even when using FC points, so I’m saving my money for other game that gives me something as EA pack system is worst then any casino the game is good compared to the previous edition but EA strategy turns something good to be garbageMr.k
Hello EA Support, I play EA SPORTS FC 27 on PC. My game always connected me to the Dammam (Saudi Arabia) server with a normal ping. A few days ago, while I was playing, my brother logged into the same EA account from his own PC on our home network. Since then, my PC connects me to a Europe server and my ping is very high. What I already tried: - Restarted the router and flushed DNS - Winsock/IP reset and Windows network reset - Changed DNS servers - Uninstalled and reinstalled the game - Tried Wi-Fi, Ethernet and my phone's mobile hotspot - Checked the hosts file (clean) The issue happens on every network on my PC. My brother's PC, using the same account on the same home network, still connects to Dammam normally. Please check whether my PC or my account session is being routed to the wrong region and fix it so I connect to the Middle East (Dammam) servers again. Thank you.
I'm so tired of the game being so unfair.
I've been playing non-stop for over 50 days. I don't just play the game, I open packs from the store, buy every season pass I get, and play career modes and the stupid Ground just to complete the missions. I just checked the PS App and I've played the game for 445 hours in the 50 days since its release on September 18th. That's almost 10 HOURS a day TEN HOURS... I have over 800 matches and despite playing every mode, I've gotten absolutely nothing from packs... the most expensive card I've ever gotten was Sakina Karchaoui for 85k. This must be a huge joke. YOU GUYS MUST BE KIDDING ME.. I didn't just start playing Ultimate mode; I've been playing since 2014. You can see this if you look at my account history. All my friends, my wife, my acquaintances, they create new accounts to increase their chances of getting packs, which is completely ridiculous. And they all get paid for it. It's complete nonsense. I buy not only FC but also BF whenever it comes out, and I buy the season pass for that too. But I feel like an idiot now, it's really unfair. We buy the Ultimate edition in early access, not the standard version, we buy BF when it comes out, we buy the season pass every month, we spend FP during promo periods. But while my friends who buy the game with new accounts and act like they're new players are rewarded, I always feel like I'm being punished. I'm really fed up with this, and that's why I'm bothering you, but I'm not sure where to write or explain this, but I can't take it anymore. Every week I see bullying in WhatsApp groups from my friends, like "delete that account," "delete the game," etc. Please forward this complaint to someone because feeling like an idiot is terrible; a game I started playing for fun has become like torture. Because it's disgusting that this company rewards new players to attract them while ignoring and mocking their loyal audience I've taken up your time, but I needed to say something, and I can't stand this situation anymore. Thank you for reading, have a lovely day.
Évolution Rôle++ bug !!
Bonjour, J'avais Carreras, Garcia et Stanway avec l'évolution Rôle++. Je les ai envoyés en SBC, puis rachetés. Maintenant, impossible de réappliquer l'évolution : le jeu dit que le joueur possède déjà une version d'évolution, alors qu'il n'y en a aucune dans mon club (vérifié : effectifs, stockage SBC, non-assignés). Redémarrage et test sur un autre appareil : sans effet. Plateforme : PS5 D'autres joueurs ont le même problème ? Merci.