Hello Holotable Heroes,
We wanted to inform folks on the cadence of Assault Battles.
Each month, we reheat a set number of Assault Battles.
As we add a new one, an older AB will be rotated out to keep the total number of Assault Battles consistent each month.
Which Assault Battle is rotated out will vary but will likely be an older one.
For example, Forest Moon will return in the month of December.
Capital Games Team
This is terrible! I’ve never posted on forums but this was enough to make me want to reach out. One of the worst decisions I’ve seen CG make.
This is an awful change which de incentivizes players. Do better CG.
We've seen it before, so many times. Introducing more random rewards demanding new units/activities at the expense of the previous consistent type of rewards with an accessible requirements. That's literally a straight *bad word* in player's faces. No, thank you. There's already enough "pay/do to get a chance" instead of "do this-get this". Guys, that's not just another bad decision + bad rep.
You guys need to reconsider this decision. This is a very long game, and it is very hard to get new people invested. Assault Battles are something solid that can help catch people up. It lays foundational teams that pack a huge punch and give accounts a sense of direction. If you take that away, you will be hurting a lot of new accounts. I just started a guild earlier this year and our next step is getting their assault battle teams together. The new guys cannot be expected to push the new teams when they only have a handful of characters unlocked. If you limit those core teams, then it will make players like me leery of putting money into this game. I put money in this game because I enjoy playing with my friends, but if these new changes are going to negatively impact my friend's playing experience, then I will reconsider my business with Capital Games.
This is a terrible decision and reeks of disrespect toward the players. While I understand the need for revenue to keep a game running, corporate greed has clearly taken over. This is NOT the way
This sucks, especially with tthe way the more recent assault battles work
Y’all care so much about “f2p” players, well this is a straight slap in the face to them. Lets take away ABs that don’t require much kyrotech investment that help give the player zetas and replace it with kyrotech intensive ABs that don’t give zetas. How is this helping your f2p players you supposedly care about? I promise people won’t get mad if we get to play more ABs.
straight crap.
Assault battles use 2 tag options for a common set of rewards.
these newer ones use specific toons for a different set of rewards.
they aren’t assault battles, give them a different name and leave assault battles alone
problem solved.
Great post well articulated. Unfortunately CG's lack of response and empathy is an unfortunately sign that they likely aren't reading any of these comments and will continue with their path moving forward.
Old Assault Battles bring us more material now, for the new ones it will take time. Why are you doing this?
