Blog Post
I never like to be negative on the forums but this is genuinely embarrassing.
It was mentioned that this probably wouldn't help with Executor vs Leviathan. There aren't many fleets in the game - it's not like characters where there are so many interactions that it's reasonable to expect some unexpected interactions to slip through.
I want to respect the developers and people behind the release here but:
- You announced this would probably not be good at doing X
- Whoever is responsible for testing clearly did not try doing X
- When it comes out and does X, people spend money to get it
- You announce that you may remove the ability to do X after people have spent their money on it
That's not okay. I could understand it for characters but there's no excuse to not know how the ship will perform against the most common fleet at the top of fleet shards. I urge whoever is responsible for making the decision to leave the ship as is. People have already spent money. You had plenty of time to test this out and prevent this from happening, but it's too late now.
EDIT: If Meathead reads this, none of this is targeted at you (as you know), and I appreciate what you bring to the role of interacting with the community. It's whoever was responsible for testing and the person making the decision to potentially remove functionality that players paid for that I'm frustrated with.
The Punishing One is preaty good for the fleet health, executor can beat leviathan/profundity on offence and leviathan/profundity can beat executor easly on offence. now we may see some executors/profundity on top ranks, not just boring leviathan mirror matchs.
BTW leviathan can just change the starting line up to dagger to counter executor (more variety)
- Hrodzik2 years agoSeasoned Rookie
That's not true. If you don't take down Razor Crest in opening barrage, you get insta deathmark and fight is over so you need to be extremely lucky while Exec can beat Profundity on auto. Profundity sucks now. :)