Re: More RNG?
@PalomaMarvel24 wrote:
@ELF014 wrote:The difference with 2K is that good execution is rewarded with good shots. As I have mention before 1% RNG would be welcomed by me in a game. Meaning a perfectly executed drive of 300 yards would have up to 3 yards of deviation. A 30 yard shot around a foot.
EA's RNG is heavy handed and poorly designed in this game.
Because controllers are so precise... the 2K swing model can be too accurate to represent real life play, but it is much better than EA's RNG.
Having more control of your shots is a big thing 2K got right. I like the fact that the outcome is expected in 2K depending on how well the shots are made. Both PGA Tour 2K and NBA 2K follow that model. Just hoping EA can follow so the franchise can still have a future.
Its just common sense and what makes a game sporting. Its mindblowing how they developed this game. I honestly think it was designed to get quick money and fail to fund other projects. They abandoned the pc in 2008, and the same 20 people who ragequit the online playerbase 15 years ago have also been killing this one. And I think EA totally resents the community and just wanted to fleece us to develop another game. The fact they literally had no online play developed on release was pretty telling. The fact the ignored all the form requests, 99% of which were for turnbased multiplayer for months and months on end without even acknowledging the request. was telling. The fact when they finally added it half * and begrudgingly and then followed with every patch after designed to frustrated the playerbase was telling. This is just the icing on the cake and I think this means they are now done with the game. They probably won't shut the servers down, because then they should really refund us some money.