@RichAC wrote:You can learn alot about things you never experienced personally. Because I actually DO read, unlike you.
Yes, as we can all see just from this topic alone:
@RichAC wrote:
LMAO, I didn't read past the first lines. first of all, Their FAQ says...
...
TLDR. stopped reading at "the faq is outdated".
...
First you tell me the faq is outdated and now you tell me I should read it?
... even when you quote a document about a game you never played to use as part of your argument, you still don't bother to read it. It's actually hilarious how you only read someone's first line, then quote a doc of which you also only read one line as a supposed proof that you are right. I find it quite challenging to imagine a more lazy and condescending way to argue.
And of course by learning a lot you mean this nonsense:
@RichAC wrote:But I do know people that have that have told me after they implemented their form of MMR< they were never grouped with people on the lvl of DrDisrespect as an avg or below avg player again
As if when Doc did his 10+ kill games multiple times a day he did that against players anywhere close to his level.
@RichAC wrote:
lol Shankhok is just a map. Glad you admit though its not outdated now. 🙂
It's spelled Sanhok. And yeah no sh|t it's a map. Released in June 2018, not "just recently" as your holy book says. You clearly need to read what I wrote a few more (dozen) times.
@RichAC wrote:And unless you work on the game yourself, The above faq is all we can read and know about it. I can't take your word for anything because you probably read alot of fake news from unofficial sources.
Oh, is that so now? Then why on earth did you ever bring that FAQ up? Because that FAQ, just as the 2 year old AMA that it quotes, does not claim that that system was ever effective. You do that based solely on some people you know allegedly telling you that they don't get matched with DrDisrespect. That's your whole argument, emptier than the new battle pass.
Second, your statement is frankly beyond nonsense. The only things we can know are what official sources say? Because making our own observations about actual reality is what, heresy? I guess everyone who says that PUBG has 4 maps is a liar because the holy Gamepedia FAQ clearly says there are only 3 maps in PUBG. The fourth map is a hoax just like all those fake space photos created to make us believe that the Earth is round.
Your posts get only more nuts the more you go at it. For your own sake I'll assume you're drunk senseless and won't participate in your self-humiliation any longer.
@2deski wrote:
@RichAC wrote:You can learn alot about things you never experienced personally. Because I actually DO read, unlike you.
Yes, as we can all see just from this topic alone:
@RichAC wrote:LMAO, I didn't read past the first lines. first of all, Their FAQ says...
...
TLDR. stopped reading at "the faq is outdated".
...
First you tell me the faq is outdated and now you tell me I should read it?
... even when you quote a document about a game you never played to use as part of your argument, you still don't bother to read it. It's actually hilarious how you only read someone's first line, then quote a doc of which you also only read one line as a supposed proof that you are right. I find it quite challenging to imagine a more lazy and condescending way to argue.
And of course by learning a lot you mean this nonsense:
@RichAC wrote:But I do know people that have that have told me after they implemented their form of MMR< they were never grouped with people on the lvl of DrDisrespect as an avg or below avg player again
As if when Doc did his 10+ kill games multiple times a day he did that against players anywhere close to his level.
@RichAC wrote:lol Shankhok is just a map. Glad you admit though its not outdated now. 🙂
It's spelled Sanhok. And yeah no sh|t it's a map. Released in June 2018, not "just recently" as your holy book says. You clearly need to read what I wrote a few more (dozen) times.
@RichAC wrote:And unless you work on the game yourself, The above faq is all we can read and know about it. I can't take your word for anything because you probably read alot of fake news from unofficial sources.
Oh, is that so now? Then why on earth did you ever bring that FAQ up? Because that FAQ, just as the 2 year old AMA that it quotes, does not claim that that system was ever effective. You do that based solely on some people you know allegedly telling you that they don't get matched with DrDisrespect. That's your whole argument, emptier than the new battle pass.
Second, your statement is frankly beyond nonsense. The only things we can know are what official sources say? Because making our own observations about actual reality is what, heresy? I guess everyone who says that PUBG has 4 maps is a liar because the holy Gamepedia FAQ clearly says there are only 3 maps in PUBG. The fourth map is a hoax just like all those fake space photos created to make us believe that the Earth is round.
Your posts get only more nuts the more you go at it. For your own sake I'll assume you're drunk senseless and won't participate in your self-humiliation any longer.
SO you took up half a page to say, I'm lazy, condescending. I didn't read it correctly...etc.. Yet you have nothing to correct about what I said? nothing to add on topic other then personal insults? Thats fine, it only means you concede the argument. You might think most people are dumb, but they are not.
The only thing i can address in your long hot air'd post, is that you claim a matchmaker didn't help in pubg. YA sorry, AGAIN, no, I'll believe the people I know that played the game and what people say on social media about how it improved matches. Over someone trolling me with nothing to actually retort who is afraid he will have play competitive matches in apex legends. To me its common sense, since over the years any sort of matchmaker in any video game has been better then none.
What are you afraid of? Why so selfish to deny others who want competitive matches? You should be asking for a separate queue rather then feel so entitled and selfish demanding there shouldn't be one at all.
And regarding how the matchmaker was actually designed... I'll believe what a dev for the game said two years ago over someone telling me hearsay unable to even link a source for his info. Regardless, anything is better then nothing. IMO it should be based on both a win elo ranking for matching lobbies, and skill rating based on all stats kills, games played, dmg done, etc, for matching individual players to teams. Or vice versa.
