Solos and Duos are needed
This game lacks of solo and duos. Making people to play in party with randoms is a good idea, but forcing them to do so is not. Sometimes its possible to find a great teammates and win a game with th...
Forum Discussion
@NiCoDeLaGreKo wrote:That's probably one of the dumbest arguments i ve seen in a long time here. You are aware that are people who want to play alone in video games and not have any social interaction with anyone...2) This game wont survive without the ability to play Solo/Duo its consider a must 3)there is a tweet from Apex that solo/duo will be implemented
2) I assume you've done the necessary research into market potential to make such as baseless claim that the game will fail without solo/duos. Respawn have said that they wanted to break conventions of Battle Royale and all you want is to make into all of the others.
3) Where are these tweets? Someone else has already asked this and you haven't provided any evidence? I did my own research and found no evidence of any mention of solo or duo play.
If you don't want to play in a trio and don't have others to play with then don't play it. No game can be designed to suit everyone.
Teams of 3 **only** and high time to kill makes each battle a war of attrition where more numbers has a much larger impact on the game than individual skill.
The game is a straight up joke for solo players and just average at best for premade teams of 3. No real way for one player to carry randoms every game and try to herd them around with pings because they don't have mics. It's a joke. There's no quads either, and there are very good reasons why almost all professional game rules set team sizes to 4. Not 3
@ragnarokfps wrote:There's no quads either, and there are very good reasons why almost all professional game rules set team sizes to 4. Not 3
Such as?
