Vantage ult can hit players behind cover
tl;dr In case you don't feel like reading the whole post, check out this clip which provides a clear view of the issue: Intro Hi folks, I'm writing because I have been noticing some...
Forum Discussion
I agree her ult is too strong. The biggest problem I see is that her ult can hit players even when they are completely behind cover. See this thread for more details.
With how I tend to play, I take cover and use one cell and I fully restore the damage she dealt. (50, gold armor.)
She deals 50 on torso or leg and 55 on headshot.
I need to retest her marked shots.
The sentinel is more powerful than mark, and is way easier to hit targets and rearm than snipers mark. In my opinion.
Also, as far as I can tell, Mark does NOT pierce targets, but Sentinel and Charge Rifle do.
BTW, Charge deals minimums of 68 or 75 damage (leg vs chest), and increases based on range. Though it has a charge before it fires, it's still the most powerful ground loot weapon in game.
Kraber deals 112 or 140 damage (leg vs chest) and insane headshot damage.
Retest of Vantage Mark: 70 headshot, 50 chest or leg, 100 chest or leg marked, 140 headshot marked. Nowhere near as powerful as Sentinel, Charge, or Kraber.
Hmm, how about Longbow?: 44 L, 55 C, 106 H, 121 SP H. Mark is slightly better for leg shots but weaker for torso and pathetic for headshots.
Mark is literally the worst sniper.
Now, if we could reload it with sniper ammo, then it might actually be useful, but as is now it's pathetic. Plus the fact you can't even put a Digi Scope on it and why bother using Mark hmm?
Why bother?
All the others have higher base damage, more firing potential, and can use Digi Scope.
For an Ultimate, it's trash.
Then again most ultimates are trash so I guess it fits right in.
Keep in mind, Sniper's Mark has much larger bullets than any other sniper rifle. This makes shots significantly easier to hit, and allows bullets to hit around cover.
