Forum Discussion
@NaRnIaaa wrote:@AWOL_312"Where have been stated, in the whole history of BR's, that they are based only on solo's?" the movie
@YuGGiFTW"you dont need numbers to believe the game is dead the fact that im getting top 100 apex predators ( mostly streamers ) back to back in a diamon iii rank means that there arent enough players grinding the game" the devs don't want to fix their mm issue and keep mixing all the ranks+high ranks are meaningless on this game, well, it only means you play with a team
Okay mate, if you wanna play this way then please, find anything (video, quotes, interviews etc) in the whole movie where is stated that the game/movie is based on solo's?!
I actually linked you the wikipedia of the original movie "Battle Royale"
You're asking for video/written evidence that I already linked to you before.
- 6 years ago
@Wingmannedbro wasn't actually for you but for @NaRnIaaa, even tho even in your link there's no answer!
- 6 years ago
Well I was who pointed out the movie that BR's started with, and you gotta press on the hyperlink where it asks did you mean "battle royale (film)"
- 6 years ago
@Wingmannedbro How did Battle Royale end? Was there one winner, or did a team end up winning? I honestly can't remember, but I feel like it was more than one.
Also, this whole thread is hilarious. There are plenty of solo Battle Royale games out there. Why would a dev need to reshape their game to fit a mold that is already filled? I like the team based aspect of this game. Sure, there are a lot of terrible teammates, but when you can get with some people who ping/talk well it elevates the whole thing beyond just a run and gun. I will probably play solos just to complete challenges, but outside of that, its teams for me.
About Apex Legends General Discussion
Community Highlights
Recent Discussions
- 24 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago
- 13 hours ago