only prideful player left?

so what do you call "provided your hitting the target"? that sounds like skill to me...cause if you miss a few shots in a trade off your gonna have to reload while that guy with the spitfire is just chuggin away...doo doo doo....doo doo doo...

I don't believe "prideful" players exist.

Just roll with the guns you come across or feel like using that game.

Some guns are stronger but that doesn't mean you aren't a respectable player if you use them.

It's called meta and preference and there aren't wrong gun choices.
I think sportsmanlike conduct in game's really important, you can limit your gun choices yourself if you want.

That's 100% up to you, but calling others bad, unsportsmanlike or unprideful because they use those guns is wrong.

Zeelmaekers

As @Zeelmaekers said, a player should really be choosing his load-out based on the weapons and items available to him. That is the most effective way to play.

For example: if you pick up a level 3 barrel stabiliser, and you have the choice between an R301 and a Devotion, then you could take the Devotion as it benefits more from the L3 stab.

Or, you may want to benefit your team by taking weapons that don't conflict with their ammo types.

There are different ways to play based on your perspective while you're playing and the circumstances of your match. 🤔

i dont feel like its wrong at all...the only reason to run a peacekeeper is to deal massive dmg or guaranteed dmg with a giant reticle....there is no other reason..."its better close range"...why? because its easier than tracking 12 shots accurately? meta to me is the same as broken. whatever is broken becomes the new meta. thats why the "meta" changes...when the patch comes out and the "meta" is no longer the broken game feature the next unfixed broken feature becomes the new "meta"...nobody used to run pathfinder becasue he had a huge hitbox...no he has 0 hitbox and is the new meta...if your always exploiting broken features how is it not unsportsmanlike or unprideful?