@hayhor I actually disagree. Most AAA publishers are afraid to take risks. That's why games feel stagnant, devoid of creativity. Especially with Apex. It's extremely formulaic, and based on EA's history, they take a successful product, milk it to death, while providing the minimal amount of support, as long as it somewhat functions, and once it dries up, they move on. Apex generates massive amounts of money for them. Massive! It would be the most logical decision, if you're interested in creating something sustainable that is, to reinvest back into this heavily as EA has nothing new in the pipeline. They could actually rename EA to 'Apex' and just sit on their * and in the words of 50 cent, "watch the money pile up" if they properly supported it. If this game had top-of-the-line servers, new game engine, 3x the amount of employees, it would continuously generate massive profits year in, year out. It's already proven itself to do that on the outdated tech that it runs on.
