@SlivPTS schrieb:
@DoYaSeeMe
I don't think that you can rely on such data from focus group/surveys. And with "sale in the store" they meant this 33% discount in store.
But 33% is not enough and that's why they get "crazy low" sales.
Even with 33% discount skins are still expensive for avarage player.
"the profit would be affected seriously"
It's just an assumption.
I assure you that huge % of players are not buying skins from store because skins are stupidly expensive. It's not like players can't afford skin for 18$, but it's simply makes no sense to pay such money for skin.
In my eyes they are not worth such money.
Totally agree.
But when he said, we were testing around, it should be a little bit more, than giving a 33% discount and check the responses. This 33% is all they did from beginning.
If they would adjust the overall prices in general, I am totally sure, the community would appreciate it and pay it back in form of more purchases. But they are not even willed to check that out.
The point of the thread was the quote "we have run tests" - but this just seems like a poor pretext for me to distract from the fact, that the prices are way too high.
Run more tests, give us 50%, 60% or 2 for 3 whatever and check what happens. You can still revised is after all, who cares? But he can not point out, they tested it, and actually all they did is to offer 33% discount on already too high prices. Of course this does not change the needle, as the first price is already outrageous.
