Forum Discussion
I have not been able to easily find an active match/server for 128-player Conquest in All Out War since the last update when DICE made the incredibly stupid decision to make 64-player Conquest the default option.
There is a great TED Talk by behavioral economist Dan Ariely discussing the consequences of basic opt-in vs opt-out systems. The main point is that whichever choice is made the default will always be the one most often selected by the super majority of people because they're either lazy or simply unaware that there are other choices available.
This is what is going on with 128-player Conquest now. Most everyone is simply queing into the 64-player version by DEFAULT. This makes even less sense considering you need more players to start a 128-player server.
The main selling point of BF2042 was the increased scale for this next generation of Battlefield. That DICE are now completely walking back on that design choice is a major disappointment, and I will not continue playing this game. If I wanted to go back to 64-players, I'd just go play an older Battlefield.
STOP TRYING TO CATER TO PLAYERS THAT CAN'T EVEN RUN YOUR GAME ON MODERN HARDWARE. (I.e., old gen console players.)
AND STOP TRYING TO CATER TO HATERS THAT WERE NEVER COMING BACK.
Except for the first few updates, I haven't had any problems running 128 player games.
- 4 years ago
Fun fact...the 30 second countdown stops if someone quits and then you get forced back into "Waiting for X Players" again...🤔
At least it doesn't reset to 30 seconds, it resumes the countdown at the previous count so "Yea Dice"....🙌
- GrizzGolf4 years agoSeasoned Ace
I havent had any issues finding 128 games.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 19 minutes ago
- 24 minutes ago
- 39 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago