2042 Rush is frustrating and not fun
I’d occasionally play Rush w friends in BF4 and BF1. Not my fav but I’d do it to hang w my bros and throw around ammo on my Support or revives on my medic/Assault. I’m only trying it out in 2042 be...
Forum Discussion
@protoman23Perhaps English isn’t your first language. I just said that Condors are somehow in Rush. Yes Flashback Rush. The only Rush available that’s not a custom match.
FLASHBACK RUSH - BF 2042 - ON PORTAL - HAS CONDORS ON SEVERAL MAPS FOR ATTACKERS. It’s not BF3 vehicles.
That’s attackers only getting aircraft. None for defenders. That’s broken for defenders. Especially on such extremely small maps with limited cover on the objectives.
Are you even playing the game?
Had the same problem last night. I somehow managed to defuse 2 times and quitted the rush mode. It took me about 3 hours to deactivate 2 armed objectives :/
Rush takes a lot more coordination with so few players. Not having squad orders and acknowledgments definitely make it less coordinated.
They should take out all armor and at most have LATVs, Hovercraft, ATVs, Pickups, and TukTuks.
@Adamonic wrote:Rush takes a lot more coordination with so few players. Not having squad orders and acknowledgments definitely make it less coordinated.
They should take out all armor and at most have LATVs, Hovercraft, ATVs, Pickups, and TukTuks.
They don't actually have to take anything out. If folks don't want a combined arms experience in Rush they can make a portal mode without any armor.
- @protoman23 which won't make weekly progression so it will be pointless.
@protoman23what gives with the never ending attacks on anyone that critiques vehicle imbalances as “whining” and as “not wanting combined arms experience”? This is absurd and childish. You’re speaking to and insulting many of us that have been playing Battlefield for two decades precisely BECAUSE WE ENJOY COMBINED ARMS EXPERIENCE.
Your overused, transparent, disingenuous response is ludicrous and insulting. Your intention is to belittle those giving feedback and to shut down open debate on game balance. Vehicle imbalances do in fact exist in any game with vehicles. Without feedback and open discussion among the fans, games don’t improve.You’re saying 2042’s in a great place and that vehicles are balanced? The data, feedback and overall player numbers says otherwise.
Considering 2042’s reviews and current player numbers compared to previous titles of the franchise, we need all the feedback and healthy debate we can get in order to get 2042 back to the formula that works and that’s loved by long time fans.
@Zhukov211 wrote:@protoman23what gives with the never ending attacks on anyone that critiques vehicle imbalances as “whining” and as “not wanting combined arms experience”? This is absurd and childish. You’re speaking to and insulting many of us that have been playing Battlefield for two decades precisely BECAUSE WE ENJOY COMBINED ARMS EXPERIENCE.
Your overused, transparent, disingenuous response is ludicrous and insulting. Your intention is to belittle those giving feedback and to shut down open debate on game balance. Vehicle imbalances do in fact exist in any game with vehicles. Without feedback and open discussion among the fans, games don’t improve.You’re saying 2042’s in a great place and that vehicles are balanced? The data, feedback and overall player numbers says otherwise.
Considering 2042’s reviews and current player numbers compared to previous titles of the franchise, we need all the feedback and healthy debate we can get in order to get 2042 back to the formula that works and that’s loved by long time fans.
You made a thread complaining about stock vehicles somehow ruining Rush. Explain to me how the stock condor is ruining Flash Back Rush 2042?
@protoman23Reread my original post and read the other posts from other players in this thread that share the same sentiment.
You opinion is that vehicles are fine and balance on Rush for attacker v defender. Based off of what exactly? Dwindling player numbers? Negative 2042 reviews?
The formula for Rush works pretty well in BF4 and BF1. Sides are fairly even to include vehicles most of the time(not all of the time). Seems like there’s a bit more room to maneuver as well in those versions of Rush. But then again BF4 and especially BF1 maps ordinarily have a lot more cover for defenders on most objectives compared to some of the BF3 objective locations that I experienced on Portal.
@Zhukov211 wrote:@protoman23Reread my original post and read the other posts from other players in this thread that share the same sentiment.
You opinion is that vehicles are fine and balance on Rush for attacker v defender is great. Based off of what exactly? Dwindling player numbers? Negative 2042 reviews?
The formula for Rush works pretty well in BF4 and BF1. Sides are fairly even to include vehicles. Seems like there’s a bit more room to maneuver as well in those versions of Rush. But then again BF4 and especially BF1 maps have a lot more cover for defenders on most objectives.
What's so oppressive about a Vanilla Condor. The pilot repair is locked and it has the 40mm grenade launcher with which the majority of the games player base is absolutely terrible using. In a 16v16 lobby, 4 players sitting in a condor is detrimental to attacking since there isn't enough players holding the frontline. In most situations they instantly get destroyed like the MAV.
