It's true, Battlefield is extremely CPU heavy. I wouldn't be surprised if Battlefield 7 is more taxing on the CPU than Battlefield 2042.
I expect Battlefield 7 will have the same CPU requirements as 2042 though, since PlayStation 6 hasn't been released yet.
Hopefully DICE can hit a framerate of 60fps on PS5 and increase the server tick rate to 60Hz as well.
It might be possible with 64 players instead of 128 players.
Looks like the perfect time to put money away for a newer computer or build yourself a new one. The computer specs are only going to get steeper.
@OskooI_007 wrote:It's true, Battlefield is extremely CPU heavy. I wouldn't be surprised if Battlefield 7 is more taxing on the CPU than Battlefield 2042.
I expect Battlefield 7 will have the same CPU requirements as 2042 though, since PlayStation 6 hasn't been released yet.
Hopefully DICE can hit a framerate of 60fps on PS5 and increase the server tick rate to 60Hz as well.
It might be possible with 64 players instead of 128 players.
Hopefully they leave last-gen in the dust and stick with current-gen and PC.
@Anobix wrote:
@OskooI_007 wrote:It's true, Battlefield is extremely CPU heavy. I wouldn't be surprised if Battlefield 7 is more taxing on the CPU than Battlefield 2042.
I expect Battlefield 7 will have the same CPU requirements as 2042 though, since PlayStation 6 hasn't been released yet.
Hopefully DICE can hit a framerate of 60fps on PS5 and increase the server tick rate to 60Hz as well.
It might be possible with 64 players instead of 128 players.
Hopefully they leave last-gen in the dust and stick with current-gen and PC.
That would be amazing
Also with them going back to 64 I would think less CPU right? Or was the main issues with 128 servers were that they weren't the best servers?
@GrizzGolf Having more players on a server stresses the CPU. That's why some PC players get a higher frame rate on servers with less players.
@Anobix Last gen consoles will probably only get 32 player servers and a frame rate of 30fps
