4 years ago
Add a server browser
DICE, please add a server browser. I cannot find matches in my region(India). I am just stuck on the waiting for players screen and the match never starts or there are only 20-30 players in a match. ...
@ExxInferis wrote:
@RayD_O1I presume you mean 'Match-making'? If so then it is handled like other previous BF iterations regardless of whether you have a server browser.
You click 'join' and it finds you a server based on region and ping. It does not look at your stats until it has already assigned you a server. Once in the server, then it looks at your skill simply to see what team to put you on for balance purposes.
Yes the BF2042 seems to have a bug/feature which puts you in the same map over and over and over. Namely Kaleidoscope for me. Maybe this is because the game is trying to get me to play the maps evenly, and I drop out of Kaleidascope 90% of the time it puts me in there.
Why have they gone this way? I think it is a way to dynamically scale server requirement based on demand. This way you never have servers sat empty which would cost EA money for no net gain. It's all about the Benjamins sadly.
Yep, all about saving money and also why portal servers close down if all players leave.
Permanent servers have been on the chopping block since BC1.
They only brought it back for BF3 and have always made the previous quick match option more prominent when looking to join an online game to try and push more players to quick match / mm.
I've always wondered when they would do away with it and 2042 is the game they chose to cut out the server browser.
As I've previously advised the OP, the community feedback that EA listen to and fear the most is the reddit main sub which has 200,000 members, the most a battlefield game has ever had on reddit, and unfortunately they aren't too bothered about a missing server browser.
Their pitchforks are out for:
Removing specialists
Scoreboard (lol)
New Infantry chokepoint maps
This forum has far too little interaction to influence anything.
@Tank2042Man wrote:
@ExxInferis wrote:
@RayD_O1I presume you mean 'Match-making'? If so then it is handled like other previous BF iterations regardless of whether you have a server browser.
You click 'join' and it finds you a server based on region and ping. It does not look at your stats until it has already assigned you a server. Once in the server, then it looks at your skill simply to see what team to put you on for balance purposes.
Yes the BF2042 seems to have a bug/feature which puts you in the same map over and over and over. Namely Kaleidoscope for me. Maybe this is because the game is trying to get me to play the maps evenly, and I drop out of Kaleidascope 90% of the time it puts me in there.
Why have they gone this way? I think it is a way to dynamically scale server requirement based on demand. This way you never have servers sat empty which would cost EA money for no net gain. It's all about the Benjamins sadly.Yep, all about saving money and also why portal servers close down if all players leave.
Permanent servers have been on the chopping block since BC1.
They only brought it back for BF3 and have always made the previous quick match option more prominent when looking to join an online game to try and push more players to quick match / mm.
I've always wondered when they would do away with it and 2042 is the game they chose to cut out the server browser.
As I've previously advised the OP, the community feedback that EA listen to and fear the most is the reddit main sub which has 200,000 members, the most a battlefield game has ever had on reddit, and unfortunately they aren't too bothered about a missing server browser.
Their pitchforks are out for:
Removing specialists
Scoreboard (lol)
New Infantry chokepoint maps
This forum has far too little interaction to influence anything.
I hear what you are saying and obviously reddit has a lot more users, and as you say more clout.
As I said previously I personally do not want to participate on reddit, but if you or someone else are willing to put the case on Reddit for a server browser / server system on behalf of this forum then that would be a good help.
You may be right that we are wasting our time, but I know I will continue to post and request for changes here on the Official Forums in the hope that DICE will eventually take note.
For a MP only game that had a development cycle of 3 years, 2042 features are pathetic. Sorry there's no other way to say this.
Explain to me how it makes sense to REMOVE all features that made BF just that and think this is ok? Do you think its "brutal" to ask for CAN I SELECT THE MAP I WANT TO PLAY? What about server rotations? Bookmark fav server. I mean the list goes on. Im so at the end with my patience and this incompetent developer.
@Buzzfunk wrote:For a MP only game that had a development cycle of 3 years, 2042 features are pathetic. Sorry there's no other way to say this.
Explain to me how it makes sense to REMOVE all features that made BF just that and think this is ok? Do you think its "brutal" to ask for CAN I SELECT THE MAP I WANT TO PLAY? What about server rotations? Bookmark fav server. I mean the list goes on. Im so at the end with my patience and this incompetent developer.
I totally agree, my patience ran out a long time ago too and I continue to be frustrated daily with the issues you relate to.
Bring back choice, let us decide how we want to play BF2042.
@Twordy wrote:
@BuzzfunkIt`s painful in many aspects. I had no choice but to uninstall the game. The complete lack of Community. No possibility to play with the same people on the same server. It feels like the same three maps in rotation wherever You go, it`s just a terrible experience in Conquest. And all of this happens because of MM and Lobby.
The game needs one additional year of development instead of XP zombie farm events. It`s probably EA with its brutal monetization expectations instead of delivering a solid game day one. Do You think that DICE is responsible for the release cycles or employment of the project manager or EA?
Studios have to develop their games in secrecies otherwise the final product will resemble a Frankenstein with a dollar sticker as a logo.
You are absolutely right there is a complete lack of Community in BF2042 and it's all down to MM / Lobby as you say.
And I agree it is a nightmare experience and a far cry from previous BF's.
@RayD_O1maybe you should start a petition.
I'd sign it!
Anyway good on ya for attempting to highlight one of the real issues with 2042 instead of all the other nonsense other people complain about.
@Tank2042Man wrote:@RayD_O1maybe you should start a petition.
I'd sign it!Anyway good on ya for attempting to highlight one of the real issues with 2042 instead of all the other nonsense other people complain about.
Thanks man, are we allowed to start petitions on these forums. ?
I would be more than willing to do so if it is allowed.
@Tank2042Man wrote:
@RayD_O1not sure. Search in these forums to see if the refund one was linked here. If it was then you can probably link one too.
Thanks for the update, I actually thought you meant start a petition within this forum which I would definitely be up for if the forum rules allow it.
@ElliotLH could you maybe please clarify this one, thanks.
I am not sure what all would be involved in starting an external petition and to be honest I feel more comfortable trying to get support for this issue via posting on the BF2042 forum.
I know that posting on reddit or raising an external petition would have a bigger audience but I am not sure I would be the right person to undertake going that route. Obviously if anyone else fancies trying it I would wholeheartedly support it. đ
@ElliotLH wrote:
@RayD_O1Best not to create a petition here as they're not really allowed.
Thanks for clarifying that, I sort of recalled posts being closed on previous BF forums for this reason.
No worries I am happy just to continue along with all the other like minded players on here, to drum up support in our crusade for the "Return of the Server Browser".
Sounds a bit like a Blockbuster Movie. đ
I can't get into any game mode now on XSX. Crossplay off obviously, but the only way to actually play 2042 now would be to have a server browser so I can find a lobby to play. Either that or crossplay with consoles only. Don't mind which Dice pick, whichever is the fastest to implement but until then I cant even play the game which is sad.
@obscene wrote:I can't get into any game mode now on XSX. Crossplay off obviously, but the only way to actually play 2042 now would be to have a server browser so I can find a lobby to play. Either that or crossplay with consoles only. Don't mind which Dice pick, whichever is the fastest to implement but until then I cant even play the game which is sad.
It is sad as you say, and not what you would expect from a BF game at all. âšī¸
I personally hope they can implement the Server Browser / Persistent Server option as it would mean we could stay on a server and play through the complete map rotation.
It would cut out all this playing the same map over and over, or not seeing certain maps for days due to MM.
And we would obviously spend a lot less time in the lobby / menu's waiting for players, there is just so much time wasted with all this faffing around.
I can't honestly see why anyone could think that MM is a better system than the Server Browser / Persistent Server System.
@Psubond wrote:@RayD_O1i don't like MM either, i want a map rotation. if they are hell bent on keeping it give us a browser and use the MM for quickplay for people who are lazy or don't care like in previous games
Exactly, they need to bring back Server Browser / Persistent Servers asap and as you rightly say use MM for quickplay for anyone who wants to use it.
@RayD_O1 wrote:
@Psubond wrote:@RayD_O1i don't like MM either, i want a map rotation. if they are hell bent on keeping it give us a browser and use the MM for quickplay for people who are lazy or don't care like in previous games
Exactly, they need to bring back Server Browser / Persistent Servers asap and as you rightly say use MM for quickplay for anyone who wants to use it.
MM's highlight of the day was putting me in Hourglass a few times back to back, which is my least favourite BF2042 map and unfortunately I wasn't allowed to play my favourite Orbital map because MM said so.
I was not a happy bunny. !!!
@Psubond wrote:
@RayD_O1last night i got put as attacking team on renewal 4x in a row. if you haven't played that map on 64 player breakthrough the first set of objectives SUCKS to take. so many deaths
Yeah, 4 times in a row on any map just causes major frustration.
Unless of course it's a map you absolutely love and have chosen to go on it via a server browser like in previous BF's.
Back then that was your choice it is now being imposed upon you, big difference
Having only 7 maps means they get stale very quickly and MM is making matters so much worse with the sort of scenario you have just described.
MM has to go. !!
@RayD_O1 wrote:
@ElliotLH wrote:
@RayD_O1Best not to create a petition here as they're not really allowed.Thanks for clarifying that, I sort of recalled posts being closed on previous BF forums for this reason.
No worries I am happy just to continue along with all the other like minded players on here, to drum up support in our crusade for the "Return of the Server Browser".
Sounds a bit like a Blockbuster Movie. đ
@RayD_O1 yep both this forum and the previous Vanilla and Battlelog forums all operate on the same exact rules set by EA>
@ragnarok013 wrote:
@RayD_O1 wrote:
@ElliotLH wrote:
@RayD_O1Best not to create a petition here as they're not really allowed.Thanks for clarifying that, I sort of recalled posts being closed on previous BF forums for this reason.
No worries I am happy just to continue along with all the other like minded players on here, to drum up support in our crusade for the "Return of the Server Browser".
Sounds a bit like a Blockbuster Movie. đ
@RayD_O1yep both this forum and the previous Vanilla and Battlelog forums all operate on the same exact rules set by EA>
Thanks I appreciate you clarifying that.
@ElliotLH wrote:
@RayD_O1Best not to create a petition here as they're not really allowed.
Out of experience I would STRONGLY advice against even mentioning any Pet***. I did so and even though this P. (the refund one that everyone interested can find using his/her favorite search engine in less than 10 seconds) now carries over 200.000 signatures, the post was deleted and my account here on the forums was blocked for 24h.
Just to clarify: I did not even directly endorse the P, but I mentioned it and posted a link to it for convenience (even though I personally signed it, but I also did not state that) and I also did not call for any boycott. So, don't mention it, don't create any new one and definitely don't post a link or endorse it if you want to avoid getting banned here.
I wish they were as fast with bans in the actual game as they are here.
@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@ElliotLH wrote:
@RayD_O1Best not to create a petition here as they're not really allowed.Out of experience I would STRONGLY advice against even mentioning any Pet***. I did so and even though this P. (the refund one that everyone interested can find using his/her favorite search engine in less than 10 seconds) now carries over 200.000 signatures, the post was deleted and my account here on the forums was blocked for 24h.
Just to clarify: I did not even directly endorse the P, but I mentioned it and posted a link to it for convenience (even though I personally signed it, but I also did not state that) and I also did not call for any boycott. So, don't mention it, don't create any new one and definitely don't post a link or endorse it if you want to avoid getting banned here.
I wish they were as fast with bans in the actual game as they are here.
Thanks for the heads up I will bear that in mind.
We will just continue to post on the various threads on this subject on a daily basis in the hope that DICE will eventually take heed and give players the server browser /persistent server system bf2042 needs if it is to survive.
Please keep your posts coming guys and keep the threads alive, thanks.
@frekwalda1 wrote:
@RayD_O1That's why we are here to keep the pressure up and hope to see some changes and get back the BF we love.
Exactly, as a group we will keep the pressure up on a daily basis.