They did when they first came out.
They feel fine now.
He's talking about the base game maps only, not the Expansions.
@Tank2042Man I agree some of the BF4 base maps kinda looked the same with Zavod, and Golmud, Giants. But Floodzone, Paracel Storm and Locker were fire!
IMO those maps were all better than 2042 base maps and we got 10 instead of 7...
I think it's sad that everything around the Battlefield franchise nowadays is focused on bringing in more money for EA.
Money, money, money.
- Game released too early because EA's executives focus way too much on the short term and on how to increase revenue there.
- Game has Specialist because EA's executives have spreadsheets that say it's a good idea so they can sell as much cosmetic items as possible.
- Game has no Server browser because EA's executives have surveys that show player retention can be increased via SBMM and that other term I forgot what is (which is not possible if people can freely pick which server they want to play on) - and increased player retention equals more cosmetic items sold etc.
etc.
etc.
Not all maps can be unique. Things like Metro are unmistakable. Just because 2042 has 2 maps with boats in the middle doesn't make them bad. I mean I enjoyed lots of the maps from earlier games but I wouldn't recall their names. Like that urban pack, wanna say Karkand?
