Forum Discussion
SkooLBoY_SkePtiK
4 years agoRising Adventurer
First, all they did to the pp29 is add vertical recoil which can be easy compensated for by pulling down. The damage is still one is the highest for auto weapons.
Second, the ARs are much better now. A few bursts will land with high percentage within 50m, and they are reliable in close quarters.
I think you may have gotten too used to the ease of use of the release version of the PP-29, and you need to practice controlling your rate of fire at longer ranges.
If you want reliability at long range, use a bipod or DMR.
4 years ago
@SkooLBoY_SkePtiK Up to 50m there is no issues thats close range still imo. But any weapon is good and accurate up to 50m. It’s beyond where ARs should have an edge but still feel the same issues as pre patch.
- 4 years ago@doubleome Lol, I agree. The problem I see is the SMG will beat the AR at close range and both fight the same mid range. It's still trash at mid range which makes them useless. I'd just stick with an SMG for close to mid range since they have a usefulness to them. The Marksmen rifle like the SVK is king at mid range so anyone with an AR will lose 99% of the time. And they can't compete at all in the sniper division, long range.
AR still needs a buff to be useful at mid range to give people a strategic reason to use them.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,991 PostsLatest Activity: 2 minutes ago
Recent Discussions
- 2 minutes ago
- 44 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 4 hours ago