Balance unkillable Air vehicles
No one should be able to go sixty and zero in battlefield. That is clearly the sign of a broken game mechanic, not good game design. It's absurd that air can pop a counter measure, fly off for ten se...
Forum Discussion
Less than 1% of the player base can fly.
The rest cant stay a live for more than 2 minutes.
You dont balance a game around 1%.
You will always see insane good pilots going 60-2 just like good tankers do.
If everyone can do it then I agree, but it has never been like that and I dont expect it to be like that in BF2042.
BFV was bad because of the carpet bombing, fire bombs and rocket spam but most planes went down in flames within a few minuts. Only the realy good pilots did 60-2 and could stay a live for a long time and only on a few maps like ivo jima and fjell.
I would completely disagree. That 1% of players that break the game by exploiting the weaknesses of the game mechanics is exactly what you balance for.
@JABUKI_68if you balance for the 1% , then 99% of player base can't use that vehicle anymore, so that sounds like a terrible idea, plus the top 1% in another vehicles like tanks also dominate just as hard, if we start balancing all vehicles for the top 1%, then vehicles will be there only for the cinematic effect and might as well be all removed.
Also BF V was a step back vehicle gameplay wise anyway compared to all previous titles, infantry wise(gunplay and movement) it was the best in the battlefield series on the other hand.
@Icemangooo I agree with you on the vehicles, but BFV was dire when it came to infantry movement. People being able to spam slide and jump across the map makes if feel more like COD Advanced warfare than Battlefield. Add unlimited sprint into the mix (which they did) and it just gets ridiculous.
- @JABUKI_68
It seems to me that you want to take down a jet by you self.
Thats not how it works unless your in an AA or MAA.
It has always taken 2-3 infantry men with stingers to take down a jet or chopper.
And thats how it should be imo.
