Are we going to pretend that low tick-rate servers were never a thing?
Battlefield 6 is already around the corner and everyone that has player battlefield 2042 for a significant time can tell that the game is not only broken, its also unbalanced and never finished
It is very disappointing coming or a triple A game that costs 59.9$
Along the years the voice of the people around this subject has been clear and consistent as seen here.
- Server tickrate
- Bad hit reg again
- Killed around corners and other rubbish
- Increse server tickrate
- Hit reg issues
- Why my bullets wont hit
The problem is not having 45hz servers in modes in which this makes sense like 64 vs 64
The problem is having 45hz servers when in the past the difference in hz was astronomical (in 32 vs 32 mind you), and you may be thinking, "Well it cant be that big of a difference right?"
Example N°1: Average Battlefield 4 tick-rate
"Well you are just trash-talking now, in the past we had WORSE tick-rate servers, you are just whining over nothing" well hold on to your hats gentlemen because i am going to blow your mind now
Example N°2: Already better
People would pay money for this quality on servers, since when EA sees money and says "no thanks?"
To finish this post i want to say that everything people ask is not the best of the best, just something that doesn't feel terrible to play at, even an upgrade from 45hz to 60hz would be a massive W.
xoxo, Über
