Forum Discussion
128 Replies
- lzilchetl4 years agoSeasoned Ace
When I give a deadline for projects I try not to overpromise and give a longer deadline to the client than I need. They are generally impressed if the project comes in early. Imagine how we'd feel about Dice if they did that!
- lzilchetl4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@kregora wrote:I can't shed the feeling, that they are working on something else, in addition to the stuff we know about.
And I guess we will see what it is, when the Beta will be announced.
We still do not know details about HZ... do you think that there will be some surprises there?
- ninjapenquinuk4 years agoSeasoned Ace@kregora well we know very little so they have a lot of work to do
- kregora4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@lzilchetl wrote:We still do not know details about HZ... do you think that there will be some surprises there?
No, I don't believe that, in my opinion Hazard Zone is the core part of Battlefield 2042, and I assume it will work, and may need a couple tweaks and balancing, which may easily be addressed with a large testing crowd to gather performance data. Like a Beta 😉
I don't think Crossplay is the issue, because I guess that would be something that could be added at a later time.
My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
- lzilchetl4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@kregora wrote:My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
PvE?
- off3nc34 years agoRising Adventurer
This gives me BF V vibes all over again and that's a very bad thing. Not hyped for it anymore after playing that test at 30 fps and now this delay , maybe i'll pick it up later down the line after some reviews. Things ain't looking too bright for this title , the game is nowhere finished.
And the radio silence from them was the icing on the cake.
- OkamiToge4 years agoSeasoned Ace
Playstation and Xbox stores both haven't updated to the delay date at all.
- kregora4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@lzilchetl wrote:
@kregora wrote:My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
PvE?
PvP. "All-out Warfare" is the part of the game, which for me resembles the "Battefield" experience. 128-player Conquest, Breakthrough maybe Rush.
This is what I expect, when I think about a Battlefield game.
And sadly that is the part of the game where I see the most conceptional issues.
That is what Can we get rid of specialists please and This is not Battlefield are about.
- lzilchetl4 years agoSeasoned Ace@kregora Gawd! You think they may revise the specialists and maybe off-line play? That would make me need to eat my words!
- ninjapenquinuk4 years agoSeasoned Ace@lzilchetl sadly i cant see them getting rid of the idea, but maybe they could use the time to have different characters for the 2 factions at least.