Battlefield 2042 shouldn’t have a battle pass
Everyone knows that battlepasses are a new “craze” in games recently. Not every game should have one though. I feel as if you need to grind to hard and too fast in battlepasses, burning out and losin...
Forum Discussion
One of the main reasons against the paid DLC Map Packs was, that they split the community which was not good for every player. Splitting the community due to paid content is always bad.
The season pass is a compromise to keep the game alive for all players.
- @CountSero This is, and always was a BS reason for getting rid as the player base was always split for numerous self imposed or technical reasons.
Just look at the reception crossplay has got.- @Trokey66 i think alot of the problems that bf2042 has, is due to the community always wanting more and bigger and better. We don’t want paid dlc, we want crossplay, we want more players, bigger maps…. Look where it got us. And its also the fault of the game dev’s , they should’ve realised at some point enough is enough. 64 player conquest/breakthrough and 32 player rush/domination/teamdeathmatch is the sweet spot. That combined with well designed maps and all mechanics from previous titles and build upon them and you got yourself a smash hit.
I don’t understand how people that are paid and trained for this can get it so wrong… i’m just a simple casual gamer and its so clear for me whats wrong with this game.- @cornybbq2 A lot of truth in what you say but by the same token, the 'community' also wanted larger maps and more players.
As usual, many of the things being whinged about, were at some point, requested for by the 'community' so what do they do, they can't win.
