Battlefield 2042 with campaign
Hello Support and Everyone I wanted to give you a idea about doing in this game a campaign with it so two side one side pvp and in the other side Campaign so that if people like me are interested in...
Forum Discussion
Basically everyone has different interests in video games. But for BF 2042 it's been already confirmed that there will be no Campaign in this one at all.
Even if we had a campaign or like War Stories in the previous Battlefield games, they've always been a small part of the whole. Since Battlefield will be and has always been a mainly online FPS game. I also kinda enjoyed the Campaign back then but as soon as i finished it, i went into the multiplayer.
So i guess it wasn't such a bad idea to completely get rid of the campaign, so the whole team can focus on the multiplayer and so make it even better.
And in this case i would say that we'll pretty sure not see a comeback of a Singleplayer campaign.
Greets,
Trav
@Its_Travis_199 but I still hope for a campaign because if they want more people for this game the campaign would be great and in Multiplayer most server would explode so much because a lot of people go in this Multiplayer and campaign don't explode because its a story not PvP
Hope always dies last 🙂
I'm just pretty sure that we won't see a campaign in this Battlefield at all
Greets,
Trav
@Its_Travis_199 I hope it will because if they read what I wrote and maybe about the explode for server then they maybe think about it hopefully and don't ignore it.
- Am I right in the idea that there will be 'NO' Campaign?
If it's true that there will be no Campaign, then why are they asking money for the Game? The Price-Tags pay for good Campaigns in Games, if there isn't one, then how can a £100 GBP Price-Tag be validated?
If EA can't be bothered to put in a Campaign Mode, then they should allow the Community to Build One. Some Games rely on the Community to make Campaign Scenarios, and these can be very well made. It does work very well.
That said, paying £100 GBP for a Game is a bit much, and expecting that Price to be for a Multiplayer Only Game is actually insane. It's not ESO or some Wide Expansive Universe like Elite Dangerous, so what's the Price-Tag actually paying for? ESO was a flop to begin with, and it didn't really get much better, though the Price-Tag has increased for that title.
If there is no Campaign, then it's a missed Opportunity, and a waste of money really speaking. People will play it for a short time, and then just walk away. Campaign Modes keep games alive, and can often be played in various ways. Finding secret Areas, Weapons, Dog-Tags, Scenery's, and Funny Moments in the Campaign can be very fun. The larger the Campaign, the more Value the Game has.
No Campaign = No Value = Make it a Play For Free
For £100 GBP, we expect a very solid, several hours worth of Campaign Mode. None of this completing Battlefield 1 in 3 Hours flat business. By the way, if I had of tried, I'm sure I would have done it quicker. For £100 GBP, we want a Campaign that's about 20+ Hours long, something with solid story, and plenty of goodies to find.
If we want Multiplayer, then Arma III is the place to go. Still waiting on Full DS4 Controller Support, but bits of it work on DS4 Controllers. Arma III has many Campaigns, and even Community/User Created Content.
Please EA, stop killing off Franchises, we're getting tired of it. You did it to Command & Conquer (R.I.P.), and it sounds like Battlefield is next to go under the Headman's Axe. PLEASE, don't kill it off.
Anyway, that's my view on it.
Featured Places
