Forum Discussion
I do understand that some people would like a single player campaign in the next Battlefield, but for me, personally, not having one is one of the best things I've heard about BF2042 so far.
I'm saying this because the single player (and co-op) campaigns have been very uninspired within this franchise - excluding maybe only the Bad Company releases, which I really see more as spinoffs rather than main title releases.
I'd much rather see them put all their effort into developing the main multiplayer game and content for it than the inclusion of a campaign.
And it's important to understand that dropping the single player campaign doesn't save them any funds if those savings are directed at the multiplayer development. Because of this - I don't see any justification to demand a lower price due to there not being a campaign.
If the lack of a single player campaign is a reason not to buy the game - then don't buy it. There are plenty of FPS games out there that focus on the campaign without even including a multiplayer component - should those games be cheaper because of it?
- 4 years ago
@UP_SunnyTheWolf look I don't mind if your a pvp player but I'm a campaign guy and no game that have campaign is silly in my opinion because in campaign again you have fun and see 3 or 4 hour stories that are fun in PVP you are maybe 2 or 3 round depending what your playing and after this it's finish and then you living it and campaign is much more fun for me and others.