Looks like OP cherry picked BF3. I'd much rather play BF3 than lie to myself and say the "Combined Arms" Bf2042 is a true BF game. Sure maybe at its core, but the systems in place and design was very, very poorly executed. BF3 has open maps, vehicles, Infantry vs Infantry vs Vehicles....classes, sandbox elements,
@PapaDrach wrote:Looks like OP cherry picked BF3. I'd much rather play BF3 than lie to myself and say the "Combined Arms" Bf2042 is a true BF game. Sure maybe at its core, but the systems in place and design was very, very poorly executed. BF3 has open maps, vehicles, Infantry vs Infantry vs Vehicles....classes, sandbox elements,
I've got 300+ hours in 2042 and have been playing battlefield for as long as OP.
2042 is just another entry in the series that requires different tactics to account for what is probably the most faced paced battlefield release in the series.
I genuinely think the maps are some of the most diverse and interesting maps battlefield has launched with for a long while.
Do I prefer BF4 at this stage, probably, but let's see what 2042 is like once they start the balancing phase.
Stew, I think the biggest problem in most players eyes is that battlefield 2042 lost its masculinity. It is the cheesy lines for them and non-military looks of characters etc. it does not change the gameplay for me at all and I don’t mind them but I’m OK if they change them too. There is also the herd mentality at play. Lots of people don’t want to lose friends over this or seem uncool making up their own minds not joining them with the hate. Also for some people it’s hard to admit that they were wrong before or hard to change their minds if convinced. It’s just a human condition. The game has problems, yes. But as Stew stated it’s not as bad as people paint it for sure. I for one try to post constructive criticism because I want the game to thrive I don’t want it to die off. I would like to play it for a few years. Portal has a lots of potential as well.
I don't really get these posts.
The player-count says it all.
Dice has postponed new content to 'summer', because they admit that game has failed and it needs a lot of changes, to have any chance gaining any popularity again.
Not even EA/Dice are defending the game anymore, so why waste time on the forums, trying to defend the game?
@skullcracker2378 wrote:
@Tank2042ManThe problem is many players want to play this how they played the previous battlefield games and refuse to adapt and use different strategies so they say the game is trash
That's not true it all. We say that because it is...
Even if we take away all gameplay elements , like maps and specialists and so on the game is still a straight up downgrade.
It's graphics are worse, the details, the animations, the physics, basic systems like the squadsystem... Idk... it's just all around worse than anything before.
